I first met Dr Amir four years ago after my daughter had been referred to the orthodontist for dental overcrowding. We were told she'd need the extraction of four healthy teeth in order that the others could be straightened to properly fit her jaw. This seemed so brutal that we looked for other treatment possibilities and were relieved to find Dr Amir. Over the course of 18 months, he slowly brought her jaw forwards and expanded her palate, allowing all her teeth the space to align properly. The end result was an even smile and improved jawline, all without losing a single tooth. We were so happy Dr Amir had achieved such an excellent result without unnecessary extractions.

Having spoken to other patients who've been helped by his approach I decided to begin treatment with Dr Amir myself about a month ago. I have suffered from TMJ dysfunction for many years and was also diagnosed with MS in 2015. As I have a progressive type of MS there is very little available to me other than one very heavy immune-stripping drug which I've been apprehensive to try.

Over the past few years, my mobility has worsened and I had developed crushing neck pain, unrelenting headaches and lower back pain which were at times very debilitating. I'd become accustomed to waking up feeling unrested and exhausted and also feeling breathless and unable to take in enough air. I assumed this was just part of MS as visits to osteopaths and chiropractors only provided temporary relief and symptoms would return within a few days.

Within hours of being fitted with the first dental brace, my headache began to lift. The next morning I woke up feeling properly rested for the first time in ages and my neck pain was gone. Over the next few days I began to notice I had much more energy, better colour, my breathing felt much freer and my lower back pain had completely disappeared. I'm extremely grateful to be free of these symptoms after struggling with them for several years and look forward to seeing how much more improvement to my mobility might be achieved with continuing treatment.

I can thoroughly recommend Dr Amir as an extremely dedicated and caring doctor who goes out of his way to help patients in any way he can.

A most interesting and rather alarming correlation between TMJD and MS I saw in an online forum.

Comment: This is the most remarkable occurence I have ever heard of. It is imperative that dentists take a lesson and step most precariously when addressing anyones dental issues.

Background

Today is 28 March 2019 and I am a 53 year-old female from the USA living in London these past 18 years. I’m a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Management Accountant with an MBA and a long career as a global senior manager at a Big4 accounting firm. I started my career as an auditor for the first 8 years, progressing upward from there. I mention this background to highlight that it is my nature and trained approach to choose my words carefully and maintain a healthy scepticism, and I hope you will read my Multiple Sclerosis (MS) story bearing this in mind.

Medical background

I was diagnosed with MS at the age of 28 via MRI scans, spinal fluid analysis and observable conditions. I immediately performed research on my best options for health and then began the Dr. Roy Swank diet amongst other approaches. I experienced results similar to those that Dr. Swank observed in his 33-year study relevant to the neurological grade at which I started the diet (Swank and Dugan 72-73). My main complaints years before the diagnosis of MS at the age of 28 included headaches, clicking jaw, crowded mouth leading to the removal of all 4 wisdom teeth, ‘concrete-like’ jaw, daily headaches and migraines. My main intermittent complaints leading directly up to and after my MS diagnosis included Lhermitte’s sign, numbness on the face, loss of sight in one eye, spasticity, general limb weakness, dizziness, impacts to my cognitive function, severe fatigue, gradual decline of my sense of balance, and a host of other issues too numerous to mention that continued on and off for 15 years.

My MS Management Before Dr Amir

A Word on Drugs

I was told of my diagnosis by a well-respected neurologist in California. He had an open mind and presented me with a number of different options. Very soon after my diagnosis I read everything I could find on the subject and concluded that a drug approach would not be for me. It was explained to me that the drugs available at the time could only offer a reduction in the number of exacerbations and may cause me to experience a number of unpleasant side effects. My gut reaction was that I would have a better chance of dealing with MS ‘naturally.’

My Amir Experience

When I was 43, my husband brought home the Evening Standard write-up on Dr Amir and I went to see him. What he said made sense to me and I started his treatment. Within a few weeks, I was feeling much less fatigued and physically stronger. I experienced an ability to breathe more deeply than I’d ever been able to. This was the most noticeable difference. It was my husband, however, who pointed out, several months into the treatment, that I hadn’t complained about any MS issues for a while and we realized together I hadn’t had any evidence of MS since starting treatment with Dr Amir.

It has now been over three years since I’ve experienced any MS symptoms, save one, explained below. I’ve gone beyond simply the state of not experiencing MS. I can breathe to double capacity, have more energy, rarely experience a headache, can eat dairy! and chocolate, have a more attractive jaw-line and more prominent cheekbones.

My Watershed Moment

There was one symptom that came back and I’m so grateful it did. One of the first symptoms I experienced when I was 28 that prompted me to seek medical attention was Lhermitte’s sign, i.e., when I bent my head forward I felt tingling all down my back and the back of my legs. In September 2012, nearly 3 years since I’d had any exacerbations or any signs of having MS at all, my Lhermitte’s ‘scar’ reappeared during a particularly stressful time and I felt deflated.


I made an appointment with Dr. Amir, and he made a new brace for me while I waited. Just before retiring that night, I felt the Lhermitte’s ‘scar’ and it reminded me to use the new brace for the instructed two minutes. Afterward, I bent my head and the Lhermitte’s sign had completely disappeared and remained so. My ‘scar’ had healed in two minutes flat. As it sank in and I considered all I had thought about MS in light of this new ‘evidence’, I actually started to cry, a rare occurrence, because I knew at that moment that 22 years of fear, and hope, and of being careful; and my mother’s tears of fear for my potential bed-ridden life had been unnecessary. My jaw had needed to be realigned; I hadn’t had multiple sclerosis.

I felt relief and then anger and then gratefulness - gratefulness that I had had the fortune to cross paths with Dr. Amir, a new thinker, who has changed my life experience.

Message to Medical Professionals

I have had the fortune to be advised by some of the brightest medical practitioners around the world and I now hope they will allow their natural sense of curiosity to explore this surprising experience. It would have been wonderful to avoid those years of uncertainty. Those years, however, have made me who I am today, so it’s not so much a feeling of regret as one of anticipation. I am expecting great things from the medical profession in the future.

From a business perspective, it seems to be a very attractive proposition; except, obviously, to those in the business of managing symptoms. I see other applications for Dr Amir’s approach, beyond the avoidance of sickness, involving athletes and raising their performance. The physical strength and performance improvement I’ve experienced during my treatment, having been a weight lifter and competitive Irish dancer in my younger days, would definitely interest any athletes looking for an advantage.

Postscript:

I have hesitated to write my story, mostly because I have keep my diagnosis secret for so long, but something happened, however, over the 2013 Christmas break that made me change my mind. With conflicting holiday schedules and extensive travel plans, I went 4 weeks without wearing a brace. I experienced a number of issues mostly related to my neck, head, face and eyes that couldn’t be relieved with pain medicine. When I, completely exhausted, finally managed to see Dr.Amir after the holidays, it was within 10 minutes of wearing my new brace that everything cleared and it was dramatic. This story needs to be told now.

I have been symptom-free for the past 10 years, except for when I need an adjustment to my brace. Dr. Amir’s wisdom should be shouted from the rooftops. Why is no one curious? WHY is no medical provider curious about my story, and the story of so many like me experiencing these dramatic changes due to adjustments to the jaw? Why?

It terrifies me and breaks my heart to think that this wisdom is not being embraced by others and taken out to the world. Who will save the next generation from medical professionals who are not curious, who are not learning, whose minds are made up, and who do not fix the problem? Drugs are not the answer, and only when the doctor himself is diagnosed can he understand the panic, the terror, the willingness to do ANYTHING to be well. The option to see someone like Dr Amir MUST remain my right as a person, and a patient.

Whoever seeks to return me, and others like me, to ill health, must prepare themselves for a fight that will last until the moment we draw our last breath. No one fights harder, and with more ferocity, than someone who is fighting for her life.

Here is my Google Review

I am a 52 year old American living in London these past 18 years; I work at one of the largest professional services organisations in the world as part of the global management team. At 28 I was diagnosed with MS in California, and they said I would likely be in a wheelchair in the not too distant future. Moving to the UK and my husband's reading of an article in the Evening Standard changed my life. The article mentioned that Dr Amir was helping people with MS, and within 3 months of that day I no longer had 'MS.' And 10 years later I can say the same...

Finally, after a 19-year journey to a symptom-free life, Dr Amir was the final answer to my quest to be free from MS. It's all about oxygen and alignment, and Dr Amir is the artist /engineer/scientist/ dental surgeon that is setting the standard. He doesn't give up! It was only 3 months into my treatment when I noticed some profound changes. My MS was considered relapsing-remitting but my balance had been getting progressively worse. All that changed when I met Dr Amir and I haven't had an MS symptom for 10 years. I've returned to my original strength. I wear his device at night and that keeps me in tip-top shape. Thank you for giving me back my life Dr Amir!

An expert says "The cause of Multiple Sclerosis is unknown.

It's considered an autoimmune disease in which the body's immune system malfunctions destroying myelin (the fatty substance that coats and protects nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord. It is not associated or caused by TMD."

Comment: In the first breath they do not know what causes 'MS'. In the second breath, they do. It is, of course, the money-spinning autoimmune problem rearing its ugly very profitable head again!

Such deception is what has crippled society and making our health services unaffordable. This collusion with the established false mantra by some neurologists and other cronies is crippling and killing patients.

One blockbuster drug, supposed to "delay the onset of the serious secondary progressive stage of this 'autoimmune disease' " is actually an anti-fungal and sells for £55,000 ($72,000 in the USA) a year per patient. The ancillary costs of looking after these patients are at least equal to this drug cost.

When was MS declared a 'fungal disease'? Never!

Neurologists have conveniently divided the disease into:

- 'benign';
- 'primary relapsing and remitting' - which they purport, can be treated with steroids to start with and then with extremely expensive drugs. Their claim is that these drugs delay the onset of the 'secondary' killer stage of 'MS' when no drug will work.

I think these classifications help the neurologists weasel out of any allegations regarding false or a misdiagnosis and serve no other purpose.
.
The initial use of steroids raises serious questions. I wonder what came first? The damage from steroid use often causing irreparable incapacity or 'Multiple Sclerosis'.

The use of steroids, as a first line drug, for the treatment of the supposed 'MS' symptoms, sets the patient up for more illness. I do not know if this is done knowingly or unknowingly. If they read the experience of a senior neurologist than I expect they should NEVER use steroids. But this is not so. This very dangerous drug is used very routinely.

This is what a senior neurologist wrote about the complications which may be visited upon patients by the use of steroids:

“In general I try and avoid high-dose steroids to treat acute relapses simply because of the potential complications. This case report is a reminder of one of the rare complications of this treatment; i.e. a clot in one of the venous sinuses that drain blood from the brain of an MSer. I have seen this complication myself and it can be life-threatening; I have seen people die as a result of venous sinus thrombosis.

The more common serious adverse event linked to high-dose steroids is avascular necrosis of the hip; this is when the blood vessel that supplies blood to the hip becomes blocked and the hip dies. I will never forget one of my first MSers I looked after when I was completing my training at Queen Square; he was a 23 years old and developed bilateral avascular necrosis of the hip after his first course of high dose steroids (1g methylprednisolone x 3 days). He subsequently required bilateral hip replacements. Since then I have seen several other MSers with unilateral AVN from steroids.

The other serious adverse event that scares the hell out of me is psychosis; thankfully I have only had one MSers under my care that had to be sectioned because of psychosis.”

When the patients reach an irreparable stage of the disease in spite of using the rip-off priced "Disease Modifying Therapies" (DMTs) meaning immune system killing drugs, the neurologists are very apologetic as per this comment I discovered on a blog run by neurologists:

“The realisation that the DMTs have failed leads to the re-emergence of grief and the five emotional stages that go with it. The anger is more often than not directed at the medical team for being impotent to stop the disease; exposing our false promises, which were made to give you hope."

I hasten to add, @£40,000 drug cost per patient per anum - you were not just misleading the patient but cheating and defrauding the whole country out of billions of pounds.

What blatant deception!
Such deception needs a police investigation and jailing of the perpetrators!

The above quote was perhaps an inadvertent admission about the utter failure of MS treatment through drugs by a top neurologist who is a very strong advocate of giving drugs at the very first sign of any symptom purported to be 'MS' related.

This article may be freely reproduced on social media or copied onto your website. Please acknowledge and provide a link back to this website.

According to this news story "doctors in Sheffield say patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are showing "remarkable" improvements after receiving a treatment usually associated with cancer.

Steven Storey was diagnosed with MS in 2013 and within a year went from being an able-bodied athlete to needing a wheelchair and losing sensation in much of his body.

He said: "I went from running marathons to needing 24-hour acute care. At one point I couldn't even hold a spoon and feed myself."

Within a few days of the transplant he was able to move his toes, and after four months could stand unaided.

He still needs to use a wheelchair but can manage short distances without any support.

Steven, who is continuing to undergo physiotherapy said: "I can swim and cycle and hopefully walking is the next big step".

Comment: What was intriguing was that Steven's symptoms started all of a sudden unlikely to be categorised into MS. We were also not shown any pre-treatment brain lesions. The other RRMS patient had pre and post op MRI scans showing that the lesions were no longer present but these lesions are well known to come and go. The third patient in the programme did not show much change nor were we shown any pre or post op brain lesions.

I think I was left with more questions than answers until I received Joan's postings. All credit to Joan as I fully quote her below:
Posted: 21 Jan 2016 01:02 PM PST

"Whenever there is a news story on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT), I hear about it. Perhaps this also happens to you, MS patients and caregivers? Well-meaning friends, family, and acquaintances forward you links to glowing miracle cure stories. And I reply with sincere thanks--and also inform them that Jeff's doing really well, with no MS disability, inflammation, new lesions or disease progression, now 9 years past his diagnosis with MS. So, HSCT is really not for him. Believe me--I know how fortunate we are to be able to report that!

For those who have had MS awhile now, these repeated stories on HSCT are heartening, but at the same time discouraging. Because HSCT is certainly not for everyone, and many can't even consider this treatment. It is good to know that some people are getting relief from MS and recovering their abilities, even if only temporarily. It's also very important to understand that these stories are anecdotal. They are heart warming, for sure, I'm not trying to be a downer. But there is a dark side to this "cure narrative" I'd like to explore: the premise that a "faulty immune system" in MS which needs to be ablated and completely removed is keeping us from understanding true disease progression.

The general public, press, and politicians get a false sense of progress when they read these news stories. They think, "well, at least we've got multiple sclerosis cured"....when nothing could be farther from the truth. And new and recently diagnosed MS patients, who have yet to have gone through a decade of these kinds of stories, may mistakenly believe this is a cure.

HSCT was developed for pediatric cancer, and has been a blessing for the children and their families who have seem mortality rates decrease and life expectancy increase. In this instance, carpet bombing the body and killing off cancer cells and then rebuilding the immune system with harvested and purified stem cells has saved lives. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/989518-overview

In MS, HSCT use was first promoted by Dr. Richard Burt in the 1990s and has been used to treat thousands with MS. However, there have been no randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trials, so even after all this time, results are still not considered "gold standard." In fact, some of the results may be placebo. The stronger or more invasive the proposed treatment, the more powerful the placebo effect.

Here are the facts:

1. HSCT is only appropriate for those with highly inflammatory relapsing remitting MS, who have not responded to other drug therapies, and who have new lesions and relapses within the past year. Trial participants cannot have had MS for longer than 10 years. This is a very specific group of people with MS.

2. HSCT uses chemotherapy to wipe out the existing immune system. Many researchers urge caution regarding this approach, because chemotherapy--on its own-- is known to have many deadly side effects, causing up to 5% mortality in some trials. Chemotherapy also causes demyelination and brain atrophy. I've written extensively on the long term neurological effects of chemotherapy here: http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2014/03/chemotherapy-causes-brain-atrophy.html

3. Long-term success rates show that MS disability is not halted. HSCT is not a cure. It may be a very helpful treatment for some with highly inflammatory MS, however the disease continues to progress in most patients. And autoreactive T cells to myelin targets return.

Our data parallel results from some of the clinical phase I/II studies showing continued clinical disease progression in multiple sclerosis patients with high expanded disability system scores despite autologous stem cell transplantation.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17293360

Demyelinating and inflammatory activities of MS persisted after allo-HSCT in all of the patients with MS. Active and chronic active MS lesions exhibited significantly higher numbers of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and significantly higher scores of CD68+ microglia/macrophages than did chronic inactive lesions or normal-appearing white matter.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20558390

Re-emergence as well as in vivo expansion of autoreactive T cells to multiple myelin targets was evident in all patients studied. The reconstituted myelin-specific T cells exhibited the same Th1 and Th2 responses as preablation myelin-reactive T cells. In contrast, the post-therapy T-cell repertoire exhibited a significantly diminished capacity for Th17 responses. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463494

And now, the big question. Why do autoreactive T cells return even after they've been blasted to kingdom come and replaced with a new immune system? Why does MS continue to progress?
Could it be that the underlying cause of the activation of these t cells is not a faulty immune system---but rather a continuing process of neurodegeneration?

The kind of neurodegenerative process we see happening in the gray matter structures of the MS brain? The type of neurodegeneration that shows continued atrophy of the thalamus in all people with MS---from CIS to PPMS? http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2016/01/thalamic-atrophy-and-ms-progression.html

There is a huge difference between finding MS treatments which give patients relief from their symptoms and reduction in disability-----and understanding the underlying disease mechanism which allows for continued MS progression. Temporarily tamping down inflammation is not the same as halting MS disease progression.

Keep getting the correct info out there. Push for researchers and policy makers to examine the underlying cause of MS disease progression.
That's the only way forward,

Joan

This is about the use of bone marrow stem cells to replace the immune system and is the most extreme form of "induction therapy" aimed at rebooting the immune system. This study has been reported by us and it is clear that the majority of people are not leaping out of their wheel chairs. This is just the type of poor reporting that the media specialise in ...media hype
http://multiple-sclerosis-research.blogspot.com/2015/03/miracle-stem-cells.html"

Some more wisdom from Joan:

"Meanwhile, Dr. Coles is busy trying to create an antidote to stop the new autoimmune diseases his drug has caused. That's right...Lemtrada actually causes autoimmune disease!
The principal adverse effect of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) is autoimmunity, which arises when reconstitution of the immune repertoire after alemtuzumab occurs by homeostatic expansion of residual lymphocytes. Therefore we are now testing the ability of keratinocyte growth factor to promote thymic lymphopoiesis and so prevent autoimmunity after alemtuzumab, in a MRC-funded clinical trial.
http://www.neuroscience.cam.ac.uk/directory/profile.php?Alcool>

Even worse, the MS disease process does not stop with Dr. Cole's Lemtrada. Cerebral atrophy and disability continue, even without any new lesions.

Revised January 2020
©2014 -2020 Dr. M. Amir. All rights reserved.

Follow @divinesymmetry

Dr Mercola sheds light on the surreptitious methods used by various corporations:

"The food, chemical, and biotechnology industries have all built up intricate and powerful systems designed to manipulate public and scientific opinion using false front organizations and industry shills posing as independent experts.

The mission is to mislead people — including lazy reporters — about issues that threaten the corporate bottom line.

[Shilling] is frequently used to discredit the opposition and create the false appearance of scientific consensus on a particular issue.

Astroturfing refers to the effort on the part of special interests to surreptitiously sway public opinion by making it appear as though there's a grassroots effort for or against a particular agenda when in reality such a groundswell of public opinion might not exist.

One hallmark of astroturfing is attacking those who question the status quo and using derogatory terms such as "crank," "crack," "nutty," "pseudo-science," and "conspiracy theorist" to describe them and their argument.

These shills also inject themselves into social media discussions, pretending to be "regular people," when in fact they have a very clearly defined agenda to steer the conversation"

When visiting the forums and Web sites of many "illness"+ Societies one can’t help but notice the many neuroscientists or others with academic doctorates who masquerade as medical doctors suffering from the illness highlighted by the organization. These individuals post information and opinions that appear designed to sway the public away from an alternative form of treatment. Their tactics include blatant attacks on any suggestion or treatment that does not include costly drug regimens. Although these attacks rarely take the form of objective evidence presented to support the speaker’s disparagement, the less educated public will often accept the criticism at face value and adopt the opinion that the suggested treatment is one to steer clear of. These are much rehearsed and refined techniques which these establishments employ to their full advantage.

However, the distortion of treatment alternatives is not the only issue with these organizations. Recently several notable illness awareness societies have come under attack for various reasons including their fiscal management. A recent case in point concerns an MS survivor drawing attention to the fact that Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada,spent only 15% of its $211MM of revenue on research into the disease. The majority of the money was used on salaries and fundraising. Considering that these organization’s "honourable" fronts attract volunteers by the hundreds - who do not receive any compensation, the majority of these salaries are paid to executives and administrative staff.

A new patient described his suffering and the losses he incurred. If any of you have suffered in this way you have every legitimate right to sue some of these racketeering societies and people behind these forums whose intention is mainly to promote the drug agenda and swat anyone with any other legitimate view. The unnecessary prolongation of your pain, suffering and financial losses are actionable. If moderators of forums have allowed such behaviour to continue they can be held equally accountable.

One victim patient wrote in the international forum Thisisms:

"I take a real issue with certain posters on forums such as this, who time and time again plant the seed of doubt into the minds of people who seriously need help.

Dr Amir, so far as I can tell, is consistently getting the best results the UK has ever seen with people diagnosed with MS. His treatment makes logical sense even to a layperson. There are numerous writings from various authorities that back up the theory. He is healing people, rather than crudely wallpapering over a couple of symptoms while creating a couple more. The most important thing is that his patients are seeing real, true, lasting, some would say miraculous results. Frankly, in the face of overwhelming positive support from real people who are being truly cured in a way that makes clear & logical sense - how am I going to trust any study funded by any drug company with their own motives over this?

And yet, there are those who, having never been treated by him, nor having had a consultation with him, nor even having ever met the man - insist on trying to discredit him time and time again. Looking through, I see that Dr Amir has well and truly shot down all their silly little "arguments". And yet, they can't accept that.

When I first learnt about how much the mouth (teeth & jaws) affects the entire body, it was through an article on the renowned Weston Price website. It was written by an American doctor. This started me on a quest to find someone in the UK who has the same understanding that he so clearly articulated there.

This was before I learned about shills - people who are paid by or represent major drug companies, to discredit anybody who claims MS or other issues can be helped by something other than drugs.

These people, whose actions seem so innocent and harmless, planted the seed of doubt in my mind which stopped me from seeking Dr Amir's help. Doubt is like a virus. I had no logical reason to doubt Dr Amir as, looking back, their posts didn't even make sense. They're irrelevant. They miss the forest for the trees. But the human mind is limited, so just seeing those one or two contrary statements made me disregard him as an option.

Instead, I went with a well-known orthotropist who does palate expansion and other jaw work in adults. This is someone who (the opposite of Dr Amir) is loud with his marketing and has videos and all sorts to grab people's attention. After lots of time & money spent with him, I had to stop as his treatment was obviously not working. It was also becoming increasingly apparent that he really didn't have much experience in treating adults. The whole thing was a depressing waste of time & money, and I was getting worse (migraines etc).

This made me continue searching until I stumbled upon Dr Amir's writings again. This time, having recently learned about shills, I re-read forums such as this, and the whole thing read differently to me. I saw what was going on, and I knew I had to see Dr Amir.

Having that consultation I believe has changed the course of my life. Dr Amir diagnosed what was wrong with me to the dot - something which dentists, orthodontists, the aforementioned orthotropist, doctors... NOBODY had ever noticed before. Had I continued my previous course of treatment with the orthotropist, it would have exacerbated my condition (to be brief, it involves a severe misalignment of my teeth which isn't obvious as demonstrated by the fact nobody before had diagnosed it). He showed me how this, without any doubt, has caused all the health issues that I'd been suffering from, including many which I thought were just mental or stress-related.

Those petty few on forums such as this, who focus in on the tiniest thing and take it out of context, in order to divert people's attention from the main message and create doubt about Dr Amir..... They are messing with people's health, with people's lives. People like me who desperately need help, and who are put off going to see someone like Dr Amir, because of their posts. Man, I don't want that kind of karma. It seems like an innocent question here or there, but the effects can be disastrous, and they are great examples of the wolf in sheep's clothing.

IF YOU ARE READING THIS AND HAVE CONSIDERED SEEING DR AMIR BUT HAVE DOUBTS AFTER READING COMMENTS FROM CERTAIN POSTERS: Please heed my words. Ignore the nitpickers and look at the core of what Dr Amir is saying. Go and see him, even if it's just for a consultation. I cannot stress this enough - I am so incredibly grateful that I went to see him - I didn't even think he'd accept me for treatment because I didn't think I was that bad. I thought my problems were all stress-related and everyone told me my teeth & jaws were fine. Well, some of the wisest people in various walks of life have said something along the lines of "the majority is usually wrong", which I've come to see is so true.

I write this as someone who wishes they saw something like this written when I first read through this forum. It would have saved me a lot of money, time, health and happiness.

ARAK"
Remember you might as well throw your money in the trash can then give to some of these corrupt entities.

Reviewed January 2020
©2014 -2020 Dr. M. Amir. All rights reserved.

Multiple Sclerosis Increases the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis.

New Research destroys the Auto-Immune Model of Multiple Sclerosis

Current MS treatment revolves around a false premise that immune cells should not be in the brain. Leading researchers from some leading universities have recently discovered that existing theories about the brain are simply not correct.

Researchers at the University of Virginia School of Medicine have determined that the brain is directly connected to the immune system by vessels previously thought not to exist (published on Jun 23, 2015).
2 weeks later, the University of Helsinki independently published a paper in the Journal of Experimental Medicine confirming this finding.
Both universities have found the existence of:

A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. (Source)

“When we started our project, our question was if there are so many immune cells surrounding the brain, how do they traffic there? By addressing this question we found vessels that weren’t supposed to exist. They were very well hidden and we think that is why it took so long to discover them.” (Source)

These findings are of crucial importance to many who have been branded with 'Multiple Sclerosis'. The drug treatment of this illness is based on a FALSE premise that no immune cells should be in the brain and if they are there it is because of an autoimmune reaction which damages the myelin sheath thus preventing nerve conduction.

Brain and spinal cord lesions which are often observed on T2 MRI scans are wrongfully blamed for the various pains, tingling, numbness, fatigue, bladder and bowel problems and motor disabilities that such patients experience.

This shibboleth is relentlessly conveyed to the patients in spite of serious doubts that even if this was all true, the majority of patient symptoms bear absolutely NO correlation to these lesions - even in the presence of dozens of such lesions.

The theory of 'immune privilege' was conceived to explain why foreign tissue grafts placed on brain tissue didn't cause an immediate immune reaction, as similar grafts did in other parts of the body, like the skin. It was believed that antigens in the brain were concealed from the immune system by the blood brain barrier. That's why it was assumed that when immune cells showed up in the brain--if they weren't there fighting an infection or as an inflammatory reaction after a stroke---there could only be one explanation--it was some sort of "auto-immune" and destructive inflammatory reaction.
http://www.jleukbio.org/content/67/4/479.full.pdf

This speculation on 'immune privilege' has given birth to disastrous assumptions about the brain and has lead to the advent of immune system ablating drugs – in spite of widespread wisdom that maintaining a good immune system was of crucial importance in the care of any illness. Deaths due to the drugs have been scandalously often reported as deaths due to 'MS'.

It is unfortunate that many more illnesses are being sucked into this very lucrative "autoimmune" hypothesis with researchers bending over backwards to "scientifically" prove this dubious association. These include Rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis, Ankylosing Spondylitis and more recently and most scandalously Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is being suckered into this autoimmune scam.

The 'experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis', sometimes 'experimental allergic encephalomyelitis' (EAE) is an animal model of brain inflammation. It is mostly used with rodents and is widely studied for multiple sclerosis. This concept was developed around the same time as the theory of 'immune privilege' of the brain as an example of how T-cells could break through the blood brain barrier and attack the brain in an autoimmune reaction. It has been a prevailing push in 'MS' treatment development.

The presence of mild scant lymphocytic infiltrates in the demyelinating lesions have been reported as the evidence of an inflammatory autoimmune process. Because specific T-cell mediated autoimmunity can be reproduced in animals after myelin protein sensitization in EAE it has been assumed but never proven that a similar T-cell driven immune mechanism is responsible for "demyelination in the human 'MS' lesions".

Autoimmunity in MS is an unproven myth. There is no evidence our immune systems are attacking our nerves. In 2004 Prineas & Barnett proved that the immune cells appeared only AFTER damage occurs in the brain. They are doing what they are supposed to do, clearing up the mess.

Dr Hubbard explains very eloquently what is really going on in the MS immune system in this video:

The acceptance of EAE as a model for 'MS' is an error that has its basis on faith rather than science. The patients are charged up to $400,000 per annum for this faith based doctrine. The literature on immune-modifying therapy in 'MS' has been analysed and it is clear that none of these agents can qualify as a candidate therapy under scrutiny.
http://www.rcpe.ac.uk/journal/issue/journal_32_4/3_pathogenesis_of_MS.pdf

The argument that the drugs can delay the onset of SPMS is a spurious claim by very suspect studies. Here is what Professor Ebers has to say:

Prof. George Ebers: MD Professor of Neurology Chair of Clinical Neurology University of Oxford

"Clinical trials of multiple sclerosis have been uniform in utilising invalidated outcome measures. This has occurred to a degree for which it is difficult to find parallels in medicine in general. We have recently evaluated the outcomes which have been used for evaluating past trials leading to drug approval and current trials. It is not a pretty sight.
It is quite clear from natural history studies that relapses have very little if anything to do with long term outcome.
Similarly, MRI measures have been thoroughly evaluated within large datasets and found to be similarly non-predictive for meaningful outcomes.
The measures of disability used in trials certainly don’t measure unremitting disability as investigators and their industry supporters have claimed.
The widespread embracing of dubious and poorly validated outcomes by some ‘MS’ investigators, often in contexts where there are egregious conflicts of interest, threaten academic credibility not to mention long term professional autonomy."

The data in the new Helsiniki and University of Virginia studies suggests that brain immune surveillance communicates with the immune system and can generate adaptive immune responses to clear up the debris from the benign lesions in the brain. The authors infer that previously characterized glymphatic washing of the brain likely connects to the lymphatic system; a testable hypothesis. The authors further suggest that this system will change the way we think about neurological disorders such as 'Multiple Sclerosis'.(Source)


Dr. Steiner published the paper: Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis: A misleading model of multiple sclerosis (Source)

"The 'MS' neurologists with "vested interest in the autoimmune hypothesis" were the very same ones who shut down CCSVI research before it could even begin, or be done correctly. They were the first to say that veins would have nothing to do with 'MS', that it was an autoimmune disease, that the brain's drainage system was unimportant. They created the narrative that those of us pleading for collaboration with Dr. Paolo Zamboni and the International Society of Neurovascular Disease (www.isnvd.org) were wackos, a fringe element, a Facebook/YouTube phenomena that would pass.

"These are the answers from 25 people who have been treated for CCSVI. I was the only one of 25 to have my dural sinuses checked. Most people were only investigated in the jugulars. About 20% gained complete symptom relief and about three quarters have sustained benefits. One lady was injured by her procedure, her right jugular vein ruptured because of over-ballooning and 25% of people got no benefit from angioplasty. I think there is still a lot to learn where CCSVI is concerned. There is no treatment consensus among treating doctors so the techniques and the areas investigated vary greatly as do the results."

If only 20% gained complete relief compared to ZERO with immune ablating drugs it is a far cheaper and merciful path to follow. The costs are about £1,000 if the surgeons in the NHS are allowed to do the treatment which is a one off cost whereas the DMT's are 20K per annum per patient plus hospital and social care costs. It is complete lunacy to continue to follow the present path.

'MS' specialists cannot stop the process of scientific discovery when it comes from other neuro immunologists, like the labs at the Weizmann Institute, Helsinki and Virginia. The 'MS' specialists are currently noticeably quiet regarding this new discovery. They however continue to attack a possible treatment in the shape of reopening the Internal Jugular veins to increase the blood flow and to reduce the back pressure in the brain in the shape of professor Zamboni's treatment commonly known as CCSVI."

"By critical discourse analysis of the CCSVI discussion in a patient online forum, we reconstruct a lay discourse about the evidentiary value of knowledge. We detected evidence criteria in this lay discourse that are different from those in the expert discourse. But we should be cautious to interpret this dissociation as a sign of an intellectual incapability to understand scientific evidence or a naïve trust in experiential knowledge. Instead, it might be an indication of cognitive dissonance reduction to protect oneself against contradictory information."