Friday, September 24. 2021
During the last 6 years the GDC and its lawyers and hearing committees have played havoc with hundreds of my patients lives and seriously damaged my health and ability to keep seeing my patients. Hundreds of my patients have written directly to the GDC, to ministers, written Google reviews on the GDC website and Trustpilot, my website, NHSE and to the PSA.
Very prominent people like a highly experienced medical doctor whose patients’ life was saved through my treatment and the head of a National Health authority have written to the head of the GDC many times who failed to present these letters to the PCC. Petitions have been presented to various bodies, but the system is so rigged against the patients and alternative dentists and doctors that there appears no possibility for patients to recover from their lifelong chronic illnesses like they were recovering with me.
To clear the picture for the public and other dentists who may become victims to the GDC jurisprudence it would be helpful to read the charges and my responses.
I had to contend with people, such as "expert" witnesses appointed by the GDC, lawyers, members of hearing committees etc. none of whom appeared to have a cuckoo’s knowledge of my subject. How would they? I mostly pioneered the revolutionary treatments and yet they sat as judge and jury on a subject which they neither knew anything about nor were they interested in learning anything.
This is a public reply to a public wrongful crucifixion carried out by the GDC throughout the world thus destroying my reputation.
I had patients visiting me from all over the world and almost 90% of them found that they recovered many illnesses that no one could help them with.
The charges below are shown in blue. Please remember no patient ever complained to the GDC.
Only a disgruntled ex-wife who I had never heard off and the GDC acted upon her hearsay evidence by instantly forwarding the complaint to a law firm who spent six months on gathering every report and case histories from every dentist and hospital for the previous thirty years and probably billed the GDC £100,000.
A simple hearsay complaint should not warrant such a huge inquiry. Why did this happen? I think the GDC knew what they were up to.
The agenda was racist in nature without any doubt as many patients on reading their preious adjudicatons have also pointed out.
The GDC had been waiting to pounce upon me. They had never received any complaint against me other than a 120 page report about eight years earlier, from a shill working for a popular MS Society who had complained that many of my patients were claiming on their blogs that they had either recovered or were recovering from their MS symptoms with my treatment.
The GDC investigated this for one year and then took no action. What is now on my website about MS is only a little more than was there at that time. Why did they not ask me to remove it then?
I feel the GDC realised that if the public found out that I am claiming success it would disrupt the status quo where each MS patient is worth about a £100k to the medico industrial complex so they closed the file thus depriving the patients of the knowledge that symmery treatment could relieve most MS patients of most of their symptoms and some patients would even totally recover.
If you became a victim of MS following a dental procedure please do not hesitate to sue the GDC for suppression of important information and the misery you may have suffered.
The case actually needed about 20 minutes of wise discussion to get the parties together and settle the case so the patient could continue with his recovery with which he was over the moon for the first time in 30 years. The GDC hullabaloo and deceitful mismanagement has left the patient crippled who alos has a case against his ex-wife and the GDC.
Charge:
“That, being a registered dentist:
1. You provided advice and treatment under private contract to Patient A between December 2015 and April 2016.
NOT TRUE. The patient was seen on 15th December 2015 for a preliminary consultation. He was diagnosed as having a serious jaw problem affecting his shoulder. stomach, hips and gait. When his jaw was correctly aligned his shoulder, pain decreased, and his gait improved considerably. Both him and his caretaker son were very impressed by this demonstration. The patient was mentally all there, and both asked all kinds of questions. The treatment modality was fully discussed with both the father and son. He was not seen as vulnerable in anyway nor did his subsequent hospital records show any such vulnerability.
He was not accepted for treatment on that day but was referred to hospitals to try and get second opinions and possibly free treatment through maxillofacial surgeons. (Dentists please note, that on reflection, this may be a fatal mistake.)
We, however, gave him our comprehensive 6-page consent form listing all the pros and cons of treatment, care of his periodontal condition etc., and the costs, to study at home if he ever decided to return.
We did not expect to see him again. His treatment was a closed subject.
However, he returned around mid-March with an acute onset of jaw pain. He could barely open his mouth. Once more he was examined, and the same demonstration made. Both the son and the father reported that they went to two different dental hospitals where they had been fobbed off saying that he had:
• no jaw problem;
• that Jaws have no connection to the shoulder pain;
• that the jaws have no connection to his stomach pains;
• and that the jaws had no connection to hip or gait problems.
Please read my article on the hip jaw connection to see the bamboozling by the hospital surgeons as an utter farce and a shame on the profession that they be so distant from reality.
On this visit because of his acute jaw pain which had a very visible masseter muscle swelling photographically recorded, and an extremely tender lateral pterygoid muscle we were barely able to take proper records but managed to take some photos and study model impressions and an impression to make an emergency appliance to ease his jaw pain.
I was also able to look at his dentition and note that he has very strong teeth which were periodontally well supported. He had a missing LR6 and missing wisdom teeth which was noted. He had little sign of any other work in his mouth and with the limited opening and his acute pain he was to wear the prescribed appliance and have further evaluations done in the ensuing couple of weeks when his acute symptoms settled down.
He returned a week later with his care-taker son who exclaimed that his father was walking in the park for the first time in many months and was feeling much better with all his pains subsiding unlike what the hospital maxillofacial surgeons had made him believe.
So, this patient at this stage had only been seen for ONE WEEK FOR ACTUAL TREATMENT as opposed to the lies spread all round the world by the GDC that he was a patient for 4 months.
THIS TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT DOES NOT TAKE PLACE WHEN A PATIENT HAS HEREDITARY OR GENETIC DAMAGE.
However, as you read further, the treatment had to be terminated the next day after his disgruntled, soon to be ex-wife, complained to the GDC saying that:
1) Her husband had a hereditary condition of Spino-cerebellar ataxia (SCA).
2) I had made false promises to him that he will be able to walk again. (His caretaker sons testimony confirms that I never made any such statement)
3) That he had paid me £8,000 for a consultation and it was going to cost him a similar amount each month.
This however is all false. I had accepted him for his jaw pain and improvements in walking would have to be treated as a bonus. I also exclude improvements in walking in the written statement on the consent form given to the patient and his son. All other patients, and there are hundreds of you, will have seen this exclusion in the consent form. I did not know what SCA was and avoided discussing this subject as the sons’ testimony supports. He was charged £120 for a preliminary consultation and when three months later the treatment was actually started, he paid £800.00 as a 10% down payment.
On receipt of the complainant’s letter and after speaking to both the patient and the son I decided to terminate treatment as I did not want to be falsely blamed of taking advantage of a “vulnerable” patient. He was not described as vulnerable in any of his medical records and his very competent son was always with him. He was never seen alone. I had never seen his wife. I had never claimed a cure for any “medical “condition, which is again clearly listed in the consent form he had signed.
I have been inundated with patients ever since an article was published in the Evening standard about the recovery of a patient from Multiple Sclerosis and another one who was suffering from Chemical hypersensitivity to the verge of wanting to end it all at Dignitas. I usually had to turn away patients especially since the DC embarked on this racist scandal. Many patients have pointed this out to me after reading extensively their disciplinary case stories.
The GDC has tried to turn the case into debauchery as a money-making scandal. Not one patient would agree with that over my whole life as a dentist. The money makers were all at the GDC.
He was refunded the full £920 he had paid and also allowed to keep wearing the appliance which had helped his walking so much (He was still wearing it 5 years later and had also sought duplicate appliance from Kings College hospital about three years on.)
The GDC exaggerated the case by:
1) Making out that I had seen him continuously for 4 months when I had seen him for treatment only twice over a week.
2) By taking the ex-wife’s hearsay evidence and blaming me for taking advantage of a vulnerable patient. (I had emailed his son who confirmed in writing that his father was not a vulnerable person. Furthermore, if a competent person is accompanying a patient than even if he was vulnerable it cannot be described as such).
I feel every patient, no matter how good their mind, is a vulnerable patient when faced with great pain or incapacity or if they have been given the news that they have MS or CFS with which they are going to be sick lifelong. They all must be handled with extreme concern. I standardised my charges although some patients cost me more than I charge them so that they cannot be seen to have been taken advantage of.
3) By claiming that I had promised him a cure for SCA. ( I do not promise anyone where I have even been a 100% successful). This patient had this exclusion in writing. No other patient that I have ever accepted will agree with the GDC nonsense that I promised him a cure. No medical person ever does.
Sunday, September 19. 2021
2. You failed to provide an adequate standard of care to Patient A between 17
December 2015 and 19 April 2016 by:
NOT TRUE: The treatment only lasted one week not four months as deceitfully claimed by the GDC. This patient showed remarkable improvement in just one week which he had not been able to get for the previous 30 years. The problems with the jaw had started soon after he had his wisdom teeth extracted by a maxillofacial surgeon at age 20.
Prior to my treatment no practitioner had been able to alleviate his symptoms so how can I be classed as “not providing an adequate standard of care”?
A bogus charge against me while everyone else on the extensive list of previous practitioners provided either no care or abysmal care which made his condition worse.
Not carrying out sufficient diagnostic assessments including by:
i) Not taking an adequate history of Patient A’s presenting condition;
NOT TRUE: The patients’ lifetime history was adequately taken in an 8-page pre-treatment questionnaire and I went through each page writing down certain important missed points, in the presence of both the son and father. which no other dentist has ever done.
My history taking is unparalleled and supersedes any other that I have ever seen. My online questionnaire has taken a lifetime to evolve and covers every aspect of a patient’s lifetime history.
A bogus charge to inflate the number of charges. There is perhaps some sort of collusion going on to increase the charges as much as possible for someones' financial gain. To hell with justice.
ii) Not undertaking any or any adequate;
(a) clinical examination of the jaw joints;
NOT TRUE: This was done on the first preliminary visit in December 2015 and he was discharged. It was repeated again when he visited during March 2016.
I work with jaws and understand the minutiae of the problem and how to evaluate and fix the issues according to my paradigm which differs substantially from established thought on the subject. The futile examination that the PCC may be talking about are unimportant and provide no value. I know exactly how to bring about healing and I do not need to beat about the bush which can cost patients many thousands of pounds unnecessarily.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC.
(b) clinical examination of the muscles of mastication;
NOT TRUE: This was done as far as necessary. It provides nil value except recrding the painful muscles. His left pterygoid and left masseter muscles were swollen and very painful. Again, my paradigm looks at the problem not routine tests like the GDC expects as those tests deliver no route to correct treatment or the alleviation of any patient symptoms.
Practitioners of jaw treatment provide bite raising appliances to every patient, which cause serious complications and damage to the joints. The examinations the GDC is referring to are for that purpose. It is like saying that if your only tool is a hammer than every problem looks like a nail. So, every patient gets a bite raising appliance. All of them get worse so the dentist needs to keep extensive notes to protect his neck. This is what the GDC wanted out of me.
My modality of care needs a different type of examination unbeknown to the GDC nor were they interested in finding out how to bring almost a 90% cure rate instead of a 0% cure rate that they are accustomed to.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC through an utter lack of knowledge about my subject..
(c) clinical examination of the occlusion;
NOT TRUE: This is clear from the dental models and photographs taken at the time. It was noted on each visit that he has severe attrition of some of his teeth. Conventional thought calls it bruxism and blames it on a psychosomatic disorder. This is totally wrong.
Photographs before them and dental study models which one can glare at, the GDC is saying that a clinical examination of the occlusion was not carried out!
These patients grind their teeth at night because that is when they cannot breathe – a little known fact and all involved at the GDC were totally oblivious to. I demonstrated it at the hearing, but they had scant regard for impartiality. I need some basic examination to come to a conclusion to provide correct care. Riff raff treatments need more comprehensive notes as the treatment never works.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC through thorogh incompetency.
(d) dental charting;
NOT TRUE: This was done. Patient only had LR6 extracted ad his wisdom teeth were missing. He only had one white filling in his mouth which was not observable because of an inadequate opening of the mouth. The GDC was able to establish this when they received the hospital OPG radiographs. This charge should not have proceeded any further.
The emergency treatment he required made the necessity of a fine-combed tooth examination unimportant until the patient had recovered sufficiently in a week or two. Lifelong experience also confirmed that a simple visual examination showed the least concern for periodontal issues. This was later confirmed when radiographs from the hospitals were received.
Again, a trumped-up unnecessary bogus charge by the GDC which helps no one other than line the lawyers pockets.
(e) intra oral examination;
NOT TRUE: Done as far as possible with the limited ability of patient mouth opening.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC.
(f) soft tissue examination;
NOT TRUE: Soft tissue internal and external examination is always done to exclude malignancy. Again, restricted by limited mouth opening.
A futile pathetic charge to inflate the number of charges and perhaps serving a different agenda.
(g) Basic Periodontal Examination;
NOT TRUE: When a patient comes with an acute pain and swelling in the mouth which needs urgent decompression of the joint it would be wrong to poke his mouth all around and hurt every tooth. This would be lunacy.
A visual examination as reiterated earlier was sufficient. The GDC spent at least a 100K on this one point when, the OPG they had received from the hospital, had confirmed that the patient had no gum disease. This charge should not have been registered.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC to inflate thenumber of charges.
(h) radiographic examination;
NOT TRUE: Patient had two OPG’s at hospitals during the previous three months. It would be criminal to take a third one. Radiographic examination does nothing to evaluate or plan treatment. FGDP recommends such radiographs should only be taken if the jaw joint does not improve.
The OPG the GDC had received confirmed no jaw pathology and this point should have been dropped.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC to inflate thenumber of charges.
Tuesday, September 14. 2021
iii) Not undertaking any special tests namely;
(a) plain radiographs of the jaw joint;
NOT TRUE: See previous response. (h)
The FGDP recommends such radiographs be taken if the jaw joint does not improve. During some 30 years of experience I have needed such radiography only in one patient. Why irradiate 1000 patients unnecessarily?
Britain curtailed mammography for detection of cancer during the 80's because:
"The NHS estimates that its screening programme saves about one life for every 200 women who are scanned for breast cancer, adding up to about 1,300 lives saved each year in the UK.
But about three in every 200 women screened are diagnosed with a cancer that would never have become life-threatening, equating to about 4,000 women each year being offered unnecessary treatment."
Breast cancer is life threatening. TMJ problems are not. Making a mountain out of a mole hill was the routine I discovered dealing with the GDC at the expense of patient health.
Again, a trumped-up charge through utter lack of basic knowledge about jaw joint pathology by the GDC.
radiographs to exclude dental pathology;
NOT TRUE: This would have been available when patient supplied radiographs from the hospital. On preliminary examination and my lifetime experience, his teeth did not look weak and in need of any work. This was indeed confirmed after the GDC received the OPG.
Again, a trumped-up unnecessary charge in tnhe presence of an OPG which the case examiner had at hand, by the GDC staff.
specific imaging of the jaw joints.
NOT TRUE: See previous response to the charge (h)
The FGDP recommends such radiographs be taken if the jaw joint does not improve.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC through scant knowledge of the subject.
b) Not adequately considering all potential diagnoses prior to commencing
treatment;
NOT TRUE: He had the diagnoses of TMJD numerous times over the previous 30 years by multiple practitioners. No ones’ treatment ever helped.
There are no other potential diagnoses like jaw arthritis which I have never seen in 40 years of practice nor was there any pointer to any other type of malignant pathology. It is important to treat the obvious first which 99.9% of the time is jaw asymmetry before one starts worrying about “other potential diagnoses”. If it was not what I accepted him for he would show no change in a week. The patient feedback is the most important diagnostic criteria at each visit. It is a dynamic form of treatment which has to be modified at almost every visit. So, set routines are not applicable.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC through abysmal knowledge of my subject.
c) Not providing Patient A with any or any adequate treatment plan;
NOT TRUE: The patient was explained the cause, treatment and outcome verbally and in writing three times. He had my extensive consent form to read for three months. He read my website and online testimonials and reviews as per the testimony of his ex-wife. He was clearly informed that after the acute phase is over that his jaws will have to be set in the correct position orthodontically when I pointed out the irregularity during my kinesiological evaluation.
How would a patient return after three months for treatment that he had no knowledge of as per the accusations. He had a full comparative understanding and chose what I had offered him. SO he had a treatment plan in his mind when he returned after rejecting the nonsemse offered by maxillo facial surgeons in the hospitals.
One cannot accept a patient with an open-ended lustreless treatment modality.
Again, a cooked-up charge by the GDC.
3. You failed to obtain informed consent for the treatment provided to Patient A
from 17 December 2015 to 19 April 2016 including by:
NOT TRUE: The treatment only lasted one week not four months as deceitfully claimed by the GDC.
The patient had signed an extensive consent form which he had in his possession for three months. Apparently, his ex-wife had also read it. The GDC expert, in recorded testimony, said that my consent form was enough, only lacking a charting of the pocket depths (meaning that I did not poke all his gums while he is screaming in pain with his left jaw joint). This was not possible to do at an acute stage of the patients’ illness. So as per the GDC expert consent WAS obtained. (Please read transcripts of the hearing)
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC in the presence of exhibited testimony.
9 a) Not providing Patient A with all appropriate treatment options;
NOT TRUE: All other treatment options do not and did not work for this patient. This patient had 30 years of suffering through inadequate management of his condition. There is only one way of fixing this problem and the patient was provided with the correct appliance which produced immediate and profound relief for the first time in 30 years. This the GDC was well aware of but still decided to pile on the charges to cause me maximum duress.
The appropriate treatment options that the PCC is speaking about are:
I should send the patient away for 2 months to eat soft food and see if his jaw gets better. If not then I should offer the patient physiotherapy, psychotherapy, drugs and in the end a splint. All these are extremely harmful treatments not worth talking or recording.
Again, a trumped-up charge by the GDC. What you call appropriate options for the patient are dastardly for the well being of the patients. Ask any number of patients. Not one ever recovered!
Not informing Patient A of all appropriate advantages and disadvantages of all appropriate treatment options;
NOT TRUE: The patient had no other choice. His lifetime experience shows that. My reply to the previous question covers this nonsense. The previous dental records confirm that he never got any relief. I have hundreds of patients who have received these alternative forms of care and none have ever worked for them. I do not keep patients running around in circles and keep paying me consultation fees every so often as normally goes on. Why should I join in this futile band wagon harming patients for the rest of their lives?
Again, what is appropriate for the GDC is INAPPROPRIATE for patients so I get blamed for the pathetic advice the GDC has on the merits of these nonsensical treatments.
a) Not informing Patient A of all material risks of the proposed treatment;
NOT TRUE: There were no material risks with this treatment. Millions right around the world wear such appliances made of exactly the same material.
I have has one patient in 40 years who was allergic to acrylic and in a permmanenet stae of collapse. Precautions were taken to provivde her with a hypoallergic material but she still collapsed. It took another three months to find the right material which helped this patient recover from life threatening allergy. She was the subject of a newspaper article written by Bella Freud in the Evening Standard some thirteen years ago after her recovery
Again, a trumped-up charge by the pathetic GDC staff.
b) You failed to maintain an adequate standard of record keeping in relation to
Patient A’s appointments from 17 December 2015 to 19 April 2016 including by:
a) not recording adequately or at all discussions with Patient A;
NOT TRUE: The period you describe is utterly false. He was seen a total of three times. After the first visit he was seen over one week twice. This makes THREE visits only and the treatment was over ONE week only. I recorded what is necessary for me. A one word in my notes like "Retrognathism" (which none at the hearing knew the meaning of including their expert) means a 7,000-word article I wrote on the subject.
I acknowledge my notes were perhaps too abbreviated. As soon as I received the charges sometime during 2017, I immediately invested in some very expensive software from the USA to massively improve my note keeping. I have been doing that ever since. The GDC was supplied a sample of what I now do with ALL patients and they found it satisfactory but later on at the second suspension hearing made out as if that was done only for one patient ever. This lies lead to the extension of the suspension for another year.
Again, a trumped-up vindictive charge by the GDC.
b) not recording adequately or at all Patient A’s presenting condition
NOT TRUE: His overall presenting record was in the 8 page questionnaire he had completed which I had further updated in his presence. His further presenting condition was acute inflammation of left jaw joint and retrognathic jaws. 8 pages ofrecords are enough record of someones presenting condition.
Is it that I had not written it upside down or right o left because I cannot ndersatand how or why I was charged.
Again, a deceitful charge by the GDC. They should have accepted my explanation.
c) not recording adequately or at all any assessment undertaken;
NOT TRUE: I am not practicing conventional orthodontics, the problem is absolutely basic needing no further thought or assessment other than what I had recorded and was going to record on his return.
The patients are interested in getting relief not how I have written my records in sanskrit or swaheli. The GDC has no interest in the patient welfare just that everything is jotted down correctly. My treatment has been result based not speculation based or to cover my tracks for failed treatments. I guess one needs a lot of notes if the treatment does not work. Luckily I have not been in that category.
In my modality of care the patient needs re-evaluation at every visit. I cannot write a 1000 words of explanation at each such visit other than the briefest of essential notes. The medieval thinking of the GDC is keeping dentistry in the dark ages. The quicker this organisation is disbanded the quicker the NHS will save some £40 billion a year, the quicker the patients will get out of the jaws of chronic illness, the quicker we shall have a much larger society contributing force of people instead of societal draining public which the present system has condemned us all into and this case has a stark demonsstration of this connivability of keeping patients in a permanent imprisonment of chronic illness.
Again, a trumped-up charge through medieval thought patterns by the GDC.
d) not recording adequately or at all any examination undertaken;
NOT TRUE: All necessary examination for my treatment modality was recorded. It may not have been 10,000 words long as you were demanding but consistent with keeping patient costs at rock bottom - something you never worry about. I cahrge patients £120 for a consultation. The nearest next person charges is £360.00. What the GDC demands would require at least eight hours of work and the consultation fee would have to be £2,000. Then the GDC will pounce on you for over charging patients!
Again, a trumped-up charge with a no win situation asfar as the GDC is concerned.
e) not recording adequately or at all a diagnosis;
NOT TRUE: My diagnosis was retrognathism as the underlying cause and this was noted and I have extensively explained earlier.
Your diagnosis would be Angles Class I first demonstrated in 1890 by Edward Angle. I proved it erroneous in 2011 in an article I wrote in a "Cranio-view" journal during 2011) I cannot help if you judge people on erroneous principals laid down some 130 years ago!
Again, a trumped-up charge through utter ignorance by the GDC.
f) not recording adequately or at all a prognosis;
NOT TRUE: The only interest the patient has is a resolution of his symptoms. This is my primary concern.
There is no point in recording a good or a bad prognosis. A state of affairs is judged at each visit. If the patient is not demonstrably better the treatment direction has to be altered as hundreds of my patients will testify. Your PCC did not want to acknowldge the handful of witnesses they accepted to see in spite of an offer of hudreds of other withnesses also.
The bite raising appliances used by almost everyone else in TMJD treatment are a fatal mistake, and yet taught in the universities and practiced by very many dentists.
Recording a good prognosis which the GDC expects is a total lie. The GDC would not expect that the dentist was honest and said that his prognosis was recorded as not good.
I base my prognosis on the feedback I get from the patient each visit. If the patient does not show signs of recovery I re-evaluate and change course until I start getting a good outcome.
It used to take longer 25 years ago to get results but now with experience it is instantaneous. The prognosis should be evaluated at each visit. The existing practice is open to abuse and unfair on the patient.
The prognosis was explained to the patient and that it will show in a very short space of time any benefit and that is what the patient experienced.
So, again a fallacious allegation based on low quality education of the subject or should I say no knowledge of even conventional orthodontics and then having the audacity to sit as judge and jury.
g) not recording adequately or at all a treatment plan;
NOT TRUE: This is not conventional orthodontics. It is a different result-based modality of care. The treatment is dynamic and depends on patient outcomes on each subsequent visit. This was well explained to the patient in the consent form as well as verbally.
Again, some simple nonsense as it was not recorded so I am presumed not to have carried it out.
At the hearing what they were demanding of me would require about eight hours to be spent on the patient and writing all the records plus the sending of a consultation explaining all the pros and cons of the treatment and all the other demands of the GDC.
I would have to charge the patient £2,000 per consultation. Most patients are ill, have never worked, and are relying on family to pay. I charge a basic £120.00 fee for a consultation and use standardised forms which cover all eventualities.
I find this charge not only malicious towards me but to all the patients who come for a consultation. Even a rich person will not cover such costs. I might get one in a hundred patients who might accept such an iniquitous demand but what happens to the rest of these patients?
I suppose back to the grind hole and suffering the rest of their lives because the GDC wants 100 page notes on each patient which is impossible to achieve.
The GDC should be banished from making such demands and leave dentists to practice how they want as long as they do not harm the patient and produce the results the patient is paying for.
Again, a malicious vindictive charge.
h) not recording adequately or at all the treatment provided including;
i) the fitting of the appliance;
NOT TRUE: I do not know what extensive notes I need about fitting a simple orthodontic appliance.
A malicious charge to inflate the number of charges so the legal section can earn their hundreds of thousands of pounds.
ii) information provided on its use;
NOT TRUE: Both his son and he was shown the use of the appliance and he was also given a leaflet about the care of such an appliance. Such information is also available on the website. How would a patient walk away with an appliance if he had not been shown how to use it?
Again, a pathetic malicious charge in the absence of any evidence.
i) not recording adequately or at all the material risks;
NOT TRUE: There were no material risks with this treatment. Millions right around the world wear such appliances.
Again, a malicious and a repeat charge to inflate the number of charges and discredit me as much as they can.
j) not recording adequately or at all the justification for deviating from established practice and guidance;
NOT TRUE: What established practice. Please show me one which works consistently.
No established treatment modality ever works So I did not feel it necessary to record and discuss useless therapies which only condemn patients to a lifetime of illness.
Again, a malicious and repeat charge to inflate the number of charges and discredit me as much as they can.
k) not recording adequately or at all rationale for withdrawing provision of care.
NOT TRUE: This is a complex long-term treatment. It needs a good rapport with the patient and if the family is involved, with the family. He had to wear a passive appliance for a couple of months so this was left with him hoping that the GDC will see sense and I will be able to resume treatment. The actions of the GDC prevented any FURTHER relief of this patients’ symptoms which had improved dramatically within a week of starting treatment. The GDC's vindictive pursuit and desire to discredit my treatments which were giving relief to hundreds of patients prevented this patient from getting proper treatment. His condition could have at the very least been arrested in spite of the nonsense of the neurologists. Please read a lot more about neurology as you continue through my responses.
HIS TREATMENT LASTED EXACTLY ONE WEEK. The GDC would have crucified me if they got to see him a few months down the line with incomplete treatment and would probably hang me because none of them had one iota of knowledge of my treatment methodology.
Again, a malicious charge mostly harming the patients.
Sunday, September 12. 2021
c) The treatment you provided to Patient A between 17 December 2015 and 19
April 2016 did not have any or any adequate clinical justification.
NOT TRUE: Again, the treatment period is inflated massively.
This is the most ridiculous suggestion. I do not understand how, when a patient walks in with acute jaw pain and I provide him with immediate relief which improves over the coming weeks for the first time in 30 years can be called inadequate clinical justification.
If this were to be true, all the practitioners who provided him splints and advise about other forms of care are also guilty of providing inadequate clinical justification.
Furthermore, their treatment made the patient’s condition worse. His hips continued to deteriorate for thirty years culminating in his present extreme walking difficulties. No one had been able to help him prior to my treatment.
Again, a malicious concocted charge to inflate the number of charges and discredit me as much as they can although there was a 100% justification to institute treatment.
6. Between 17 December 2015 and 19 April 2016, you made statements to Patient A that:
a) the treatment you were able to provide would slow Patient A’s symptoms of Spinal Cerebellar Ataxia or words to that effect;
NOT TRUE: I had never seen or heard about Spinal cerebellar ataxia. So, I do not know how I could have given him such an undertaking. His son’s testimony supports my stand.
I am very aware that walking difficulties are involved with the asymmetry of the hips and aligning the jaws correctly immediately levels the hips out and provides an immediate improvement in gait. This was demonstrated to the patient who was shocked to experience the change BUT his expectations were actually discouraged, as per his son’s testimony.
Furthermore, it so happens that my consent form given to the patient says in writing that walking difficulties cannot be helped.
My consent form says:
"MS, ME/CFS and Fibromyalgia patients and other chronic illnesses: Please note that the outcomes are dependent on the length of time that you have been ill and the amount of disability you present with at the outset. Having worked on such patients for many years it appears that most symptoms resolve but the walking disability produces mixed results. I do not have the means to discover what the hindrance is and perhaps in time we will find a solution but in the meantime please do not expect much in terms of improvements in your walking disability."
This is prima facie evidence which vindicates me. Judge Judy would have thrown the case out instantly but the PCC managed to spend a couple of hundred thousand pounds on this subject.
The GDC tried its darndest, to see if they can find me guilty on this count so that they could bring a criminal charge against me. Even a magistrates court would have thrown the case out in five minutes.
His son’s testimony also dismisses this allegation and so does the patient’s testimony.
Again, a criminal conspiracy by the GDC to inflate the number of charges and waste dentists annual subscriptions on futile pursuits apart from damaging very many sick patients. All my patients who have been damaged by the handling of my case have a case against the GDC for deprivation of treatment and prolonging their pain and suffering.
b) the treatment you were able to provide would improve Patient A’s symptoms of Spinal Cerebellar Ataxia or words to that effect;
This is a repeat of 6. (a)
b) Patient A’s symptoms were caused by a dysfunctional jaw joint and not Spinal Cerebellar Ataxia or words to that effect.
NOT TRUE: No such statement was made other than demonstrating a cause and effect which he experienced. And as do dozens of other patients I have seen over the years. The son’s testimony supports that I made no such statement or gave any such undertaking. This has all been cooked up by the GDC staff with their ulterior motives. The law society ought to be involved, how in the absence of prima facie evidence that my patients should have been put through such pain and suffering by a wrongful ppursuit and suspension.
Again, a malicious charge inspite of prima facie evidence to the contrary.
7. You conduct at 6(a) and/or 6(b) and/or 6(c) was:
a) Misleading; and/or,
NOT TRUE: How demonstrating a link and the patient reporting a benefit can be misleading is beyond me. I have at least 70 other patients with a walking difficultes where I have been able to demonstrate the same exact improvement no matter what their original doisagnoses.
This is unheard of in the dental or medical profession including neurology. They are not even aware of the hip jaw connection. Please read my article on Spino-cerebellar ataxia.
The GDC/PCC were not interested in an art form which could transform the lives of thousands of other patients in the country.
Again, a charge designed to discredit rather discover the truth.
b) Dishonest, as you knew there was no reasonable body of evidence to support these statement(s).
My unique system of care brought real relief and sent some 700 patients back to work over the last 40 years. I have a success rate of more than 90%.
There is NO REASONABLE BODY OF EVIDENCE out there which matches these outcomes. There is no EBM for me to consult or utilise. If the GDC had impartially tried to utilise the evidence I provide in numerous original articles, supported with graphical studies it would not have levelled such an accusation against me. But probably taken my support for improving the lives of millions all around the country. Such altruism is totally absent amongst this group in whom society has entrusted their lives and wellbeing.
Conventional medicine is well supported with an Evidence Base but most hospital departments have a 0% success rate and often patients die as a consequence of the medicines prescribed in spite of the evidence base they back their treatments with.
At the hearing the head of the Worcestershire health authority confirmed my claim of 0% success rates in most hospital departments.
The 0% success rates stem from the very fact that at the heart of the patients’ illness is an asymmetry of their structure. Therefore, no medical treatment is ever successful.
Treating the jaws rapidly starts bringing a resolution of the symptoms.
A great deal of published evidence base is very suspect. I have written an article titled The modern day farce of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) on this subject.
EBM downgrades traditional forms of medical evidence, notably a doctor’s clinical experience and understanding. EBM has failed in the real world of medicine, in terms of its use in making medical decisions and in proving causality as there is none.
The controlling bodies are policing organisations devoted to the scam of evidence-based medicine with none of the open-mindedness needed for the clinical practice of complex cases which my practice is submerged with.
The GDC’s stand has failed to properly evaluate my system of treatment and their conclusions have had a devastating effect on patient health.
A general practitioner recently writing in the BMJ, said that evidence-based medicine is polluted with “fraud, sham diagnosis, short-term data, poor regulation, surrogate ends, questionnaires that can’t be validated, and statistically significant but clinically irrelevant outcomes”, all leading to “over diagnosis and misery”.
This is what the GDC wants me to subscribe to by accusations of dishonesty and broadcasting their contemptuous and libellous conclusions to the whole world.
In fact, they want me to follow the existing dishonest paradigm and continue to devastate patient lives!.
The GDC /PCC could not find me guilty of even one sentence on my Website which is in any way dishonest. If they did they would not only have struck me off but also charged me with a criminal action and handed over the case to the police.
No one has ever even discovered and managed to heal the conditions on my website, so where is the evidence. Other practitioners are referring to my findings as an evidence base.
I do not have the funds for extensive studies and write scientific papers like the universities do. Perhaps the GDC which collects some 150 million pounds a year from subscribing professionals should have used the monies to help scientifically evaluate and establish a scientific base instead of spending millions on lawyers to crucify dentists and deny patient of the rightful treatment.
From this point onwards if any patient develops any hip or back pain or a gait deformity following a dental procedure should sue the dentist and the GDC for ignoring this most fundamental factor in bodily symmetry. A ONE mm change in the mouth can lead to a FIVE-centimetre discrepancy in the hip levels. Every dental procedure should evaluate a pre and post-operative hip level!
Again, a charge based on total ignorance, not reading the 1000 pages furnished to the PCC, and coming to unjust conclusions seriously harming patients and leaving them permanently disabled.
Saturday, September 11. 2021
From here on the manufactured charges are about my website8. For a period of time up to and including 22 January 2019, you made statements on http://dramir.com to the effect that:
a) Cranio-dental symmetry aims to restore balance to bodily systems, bringing about a permanent and lifelong improvement in health and well-being.
YES, I have made such statements and proved my point amongst hundreds of recovered patients. Their Google reviews on my website are unparalleled. No other practitioner can claim such results. Patients travel from halfway round the world to recover from illnesses that no one has been able to even slightly dent.
The only people totally blind to the subject are the GDC and all its cronies who have purposefully avoided referring to any success stories but instead decided to make a villain out of me and an idiot out of all the recovered patients.. Remission of illness appears counter to the aspirations of the GDC. I would call this charge a criminal RACIST conspiracy against me. A person with the right colour would probably be nominated for the nobel prize!
One of he most recent postings on the GDC Google review is:
"Following a period of treatment with Dr Amir, my wife has totally recovered after almost 20 years of illness with Fibromyalgia that had left her unable to work despite the many medications she was prescribed. She lost the best years of her life and her situation appears to have been caused by a dentist pulling a number of her teeth out, effectively shrinking her jaw.
We have a very handicapped son and looking after both my son and my wife whilst going to work full time to earn a living has been quite an ordeal.
Someone is responsible for our losses and the subsequent mental stress incurred.
I fail to understand why you, as a governing body, allow such treatment whilst condemning Dr Amir, a dentist who completely disagrees with the extraction of teeth. I can only perceive that you are a corrupt organisation that exists to prevent patients from obtaining proper treatment to recover and be free of the shackles of chronic illness.
I sincerely hope that a high court judge will see the truth, ban you from your evil agenda and restore Dr Amir's reputation, which it appears you have gone out of your way to destroy. "
The GDC set up needs to be completely ripped apart by some well-meaning authority.
I MEAN WHAT I CLAIMED and have proved it beyond doubt time and again. I stand by every word that I have ever written on my website. Another patient recently wrote on the GDC reviews that I cured her migraines in one weekend 45 years ago after she had been an inpatient in a hospital for six months with no success. If this is not permanent improvement what is?
Another review has also been written today as my old patients who fully and permanently recovered are finding out about what the GDC has done:
I stand 100% in support of Dr Amir. He is a professional, ethical and patient focused dentist who has pioneered the treatment of multiple symptoms and illness dismissed by many. I echo the stories and heartfelt testimonies of fellow patients. I was fortunate enough to find Dr Amir via another health care practitioner when I was 23 years old. I am in no doubt he saved my life. I had been dismissed as another ME, Fibromyalgia patient. I was bedridden and unable to function, with symptoms that were worsening since I was 14 years old.
There were no false promises, no exaggerated claims but factual, evidence-based explanations for my lived experience. Too many people with symptoms that don't fit in boxes are dismissed and left to fight for their own lives.
Dr Amir is a medical professional fighting for us, and the impact of his suspension is catastrophic for so many. He can 100% make the claims he does because he has proven results. I went from hardly being able to walk or function, to immediate changes and improvements through the use of dental appliances and breathing.
I have photographic evidence of the changes in my facial structure and the improvement. The testimony of so many patients speaks for itself. Many of us with multiple and complex symptoms have seen countless specialists and have been ignored or dismissed. We know our bodies and our evidence should be considered in any review of claims. I trust Dr Amir and he has been nothing but professional, caring and ethical in all his work with me. I am also contacting the GDC regarding its review. You should not be able to dismiss years of evidence-based work and deny consenting adults access to treatment. 4 Dr Amir has my full support. Fellow Spoonies - he is the real deal.! Kirsten
I have dozens of other patients who recovered permanently from many illness conditions. If the hearing committee had cared to read the 1000 pages of my website which the GDC had provided them I would not have been charged with all these malicious allegations, at the behest of non-expert, whom the GDC appointed to give them "expert" advice. He had absolutely no knowledge of my modality of care OR any other heading under which he expressed his "expert" opinions which they PCC whole heartedly accepted.
The patient success stories were the least of their concerns.
This expert acted beyond his expertise and slanderously tried to besmirch my name while mesmerising an equally ill-chosen hearing committee.
Please read hundreds of reviews on Google and on the GDC website condemning the GDC for finding me guilty on subjects where I have hundreds of recovered patients.
Again, a malicious charge to inflate the number of charges and discredit and slander me as much as they could.
Please help support my endeavours so that we can revolutionise dentistry and help the millions who are chronically sick all over the world and banish and condenm all those who obstruct the sick from recovery namely the GDC. b) That the following conditions can be attributed to a dysfunctional jaw joint:
i. Asthma;
Yes a 100% true: Please read the extensive article I have written about Asthma and patient testimonials. The patients are being conned and condemned to a lifelong illness needing steroids and inhalers and an early death.
I have had almost a 100% success rate with asthma patients who all came off their inhalers permanently some within days of starting treatment. For the GDC to charge me in the presence of evidence on my website and numerous witnesses, I can only deduce that the GDC does not appreciate anyone finding a non-drug cure and wants to discredit those who do!
I am confused whether these do-gooders are working for the public good or big pharma.
Every single patient who has come to me has recovered from this symptom. They may have presented with a jaw problem with one of the symptoms listed as Asthma but recover rapidly from this symptom in no time at all. My research shows a completely different understanding of Asthma is needed. It is actually a part of a major problem with patients suffering from multiple other problems too.
This graph exemplifies what I mean about Asthma being a complex issue: 
Please note that the jaw problem and asthma are very profound shown by the darkness of the images. The patients also have other issues all amenable to jaw symmetry treatment and this enables the asthma to disappear also. numerous other symptoms associated with Asthma which are all amenable to treatment when the jaw is correctly aligned. Asthma also resolves.
A Dr Harris wrote in a magazine about the treatment of her daughter at my office. These are the relevant excerpts:
“Presenting Symptoms: For a number of years Claire had suffered from rhinitis (runny nose), bouts of sneezing, coughing and wheezy-type symptoms. It was quite clear to us that she was sensitive to artificial food additives as well as being seriously allergic to peanuts……………….
Conclusion: This course of orthodontic treatment has been the only form of intervention used to improve our daughter's health over the past fifteen months. Compared to her contemporaries undergoing reductionist forms of orthodontic treatment, this approach has been very nearly pain-free without the need for strong analgesic medication and of a relatively short duration. She has suffered virtually no head, neck or back ache during the course of this treatment. All her presenting symptoms have effectively disappeared. She no longer requires any form of medication.”
This was all in the bundle with every member of the PCC. They never bothered to read it.
The GDC expert had no knowledge of thoracic diseases nor did he care to read my explanations or patient testimonials supporting my almost 100% outcomes. There is no evidence based when medicine is all mixed up and unable to find either the real cause or a real cure..
This charge attempts to mislead the public so they can continue with their inhaler treatments. The GDC works for big pharma interests - not the patients’ interest. There are 5.4 million asthmatics in the country. The GDC has seriously jeopardised their chances of getting them the correct treatment. I have worked hard on this subject and found the proper answers. I suppose the medico-pharmacological junta continues to dupe the public and takes advantage of the vulnerable but there are no checks and balances on them.
Here are some statistics:
• 5.4 million people in the UK are currently receiving treatment for asthma: 1.1 million children (1 in 11) and 4.3 million adults (1 in 12).
• The UK’s average asthma death rate over five years is worse than countries such as Greece, Italy and the Netherlands – and it is almost 50% higher than the average death rate in the European Union.
• The NHS spends around 1 billion a year treating and caring for people with asthma.
• One in 11 children has asthma and it is the most common long-term medical condition.
• Asthma attacks hospitalise someone every 8 minutes; 185 people are admitted to hospital because of asthma attacks every day in the UK (a child is admitted to hospital every 20 minutes because of an asthma attack).
And what does the GDC do when it finds that someone has found a defnitive treatment for tis condition. It routes them. Abso;lutely no empathy for the millions of sufferers.
Such altruism is absent at tthe GDC.
They do have hundreds of millions of pounds for their lawyers to stamp out any beneficial treatments.
I find this charge bogus and designed to fool the public and deprive them of the correct treatment. I have discovered the ins and outs of Asthma. If my method is not followed there shall be no relief for asthmatics. I cannot wait to impart my knowledge to others so that millions of sufferers can be helped. The GDC ought to be ashamed of charging me with a simple word "Asthma" with no thought or knowledge supporting their acusation.
ii. Ataxia;
YES TRUE: I have been treating Ataxia patients for a very long time and have basic knowledge in the context of the relationship of the jaw to hip asymmetries which leads to walking difficulties. Please read my extensive article on Ataxia and the relationship of the jaw to the hip asymmetries leading to ataxic difficulties.
Please see this graph which presents a true picture of the multitude of symptoms. Only the most prevalent symptoms have been listed. Some patients have 40 plus symptoms: 
This graph is from patient completed responses. It is not a true scientific evaluation nor peer reviewed.
The graph is to enable patients to see if they can recognise the patterns to see if this applies to them.
This is from my original article quoted above, which shows that it is imperative that the whole of the dental profession becomes aware of this relationship, as a one mm change in the mouth can change the hip by 5cm and cause the patient lifelong suffering. Instead of acknowledging this the GDC has tried to suppress this knowledge by criminally suppressing this information and discrediting me.
The following is an excerpt from a letter a medical doctor wrote to the head of the GDC about his child’s ataxic issues suffering from Cerebral palsy:
“As long as he was wearing Dr Amir’s dental appliances his symptoms and his spasticity were less pronounced, his sleep better, and his fine motor skills more fluent and faster evolving.
May I remind you that Ataxia is commonly understood to have no cure as there are no medications that can specifically improve and cure the symptoms of ataxia.
By integrating non-pharmacological models such as the knowledge of the inter-relationship between structural and neurological physiology, the entire management of ataxia symptoms could become more of a dynamic approach with flexible assessment and treatment strategies. My son is the living proof, that this works in real life, - he is now 10, attends mainstream school, -his motor strength and balancing are constantly improving. He can now independently walk with two sticks and to some degree, his walk is now more coordinated and his pathological leg scissoring reflexes are less active when the appliance is worn in his mouth. I am beginning to suspect that an integrated care strategy for managing ataxia as Dr Amir can offer could provide some hope for many suffering individuals [with ataxia].”
This was suppressed by the head of the GDC and not brought before the hearing committee at any stage.
The PCC and all engaged in this case made humbug about this concept rather than trying to make this knowledge widely available. If it was correctly handled the benefits are phenomenal resulting in a huge drop in:
1. Back ache and hip pain.
2. Sciatic nerve pain
3. The need for hip replacements.
4. All other related symptoms as per the graph above.
5. A huge improvement in patient health and ability to lead active lives
6. A huge saving in hospital costs and social security costs.
7. Hospital waiting lists would be brought down by at least 50%.
I fail to understand the vindictiveness that I was treated with. Their spiteful agenda which was as if I had murdered some one and all they needed to decide was whether if they should jail me for life or hang me instead of trying to recognise a new truth that had dawned upon them. They just could not stomach a little immigrant from an obscure corner of London to be capable of discovering such revolutionary concepts.
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge designed to deprive patients proper treatment with pathetic scant knowledge of the subject of Ataxia by any participant in the hearing process.
iii. Allergies;
Allergies, as understood conventionally appears to be flawed. I have a number of patients who have recovered from minor allergic issues such as sensitivity to cat hairs as soon as they started the jaw treatment but a more profound allergic reaction and its successful treatment is in this letter from a German doctor after I had saved his patient from going for Euthanasia at the age of 40 suffering from horrific allergy to any kind of smell which would paralyse her. The doctor in a letter to the GDC says:
“Such a shared-care patient is Mrs. Claire W an entrepreneurial and dynamic businesswoman in her forties who came to see me, initially for the treatment of her unexplained Myasthenia reactions which show in a sudden loss of muscle tone and sudden collapse onto the floor in public places.
From the knowledge that these reactions were linked to exposure to drugs, environmental toxins, chemicals, even perfume odours she had no other option than to avoid all public spaces, transport systems, supermarkets. For years she battled with this detrimental condition known as Multiple Chemical Hyper-Sensitivity MChS). The isolation and bleakness in her life brought her close to suicide and she allegedly made contact with Dignitas in Switzerland at this stage.
My own assessment and treatment approach gave her hope and stabilised her situation, the details of which would prove to be too much for the purpose of this letter. When at a certain point she plateaued and it became obvious that other structural factors such as dental, TMJ, and cranial imbalances would need to be addressed to make further progress I decided to contact Dr. Amir in 2009 when I first came across his work.
Mr Amir accepted her as a patient for an initial assessment but admitted that he had never treated anyone in such a fragile state and that it may take time for a care plan to evolve in a safe and manageable way. He realised she had a hidden but serious jaw and orthodontic problem and suggested a course of treatment.
When the first fitting of the prescribed appliance took place the patient apparently collapsed when reacting to the substances of the device despite precautions of using hypoallergenic materials. Alternative materials to which she didn’t react were eventually found under some difficulties. The subsequent recovery process was steady and continuous however not a linear process and on several occasions, my own medical interventions were required to steady her situation.
The uniqueness of the case which began from an almost hopeless starting position attracted the attention of a national newspaper. In an article written by editor Bella Freud, a society journalist the patient explained that the unique path she chose saved her life and that other patients with complex illnesses, allergies, or MChS could perhaps be helped in a similar way by accepting and understanding the influence that dentistry has on patients’ immune systems.
Meanwhile, I continued monitoring this patient and she has not relapsed since and has enjoyed a very full life for many years in the meantime.”
Again, the GDC head suppressed this information and held it back from the PCC.
My experience confirms that allergies are actually a different phenomenon than what is understood and practiced and when treated correctly almost all patients havAllergies, as understood conventionally appears to be flawed. I have a number of patients who have recovered from minor allergic issues such as sensitivity to cat hairs as soon as they started the jaw treatment but a more profound allergic reaction and its successful treatment is in this letter from a German doctor after I had saved his patient from going for Euthanasia at the age of 40 suffering from horrific allergy to any kind of smell which would paralyse her. The doctor in a letter to the GDC says:
“Such a shared-care patient is Mrs. Claire W an entrepreneurial and dynamic businesswoman in her forties who came to see me, initially for the treatment of her unexplained Myasthenia reactions which show in a sudden loss of muscle tone and sudden collapse onto the floor in public places.
From the knowledge that these reactions were linked to exposure to drugs, environmental toxins, chemicals, even perfume odours she had no other option than to avoid all public spaces, transport systems, supermarkets. For years she battled with this detrimental condition known as Multiple Chemical Hyper-Sensitivity MChS). The isolation and bleakness in her life brought her close to suicide and she allegedly made contact with Dignitas in Switzerland at this stage.
My own assessment and treatment approach gave her hope and stabilised her situation, the details of which would prove to be too much for the purpose of this letter. When at a certain point she plateaued and it became obvious that other structural factors such as dental, TMJ, and cranial imbalances would need to be addressed to make further progress I decided to contact Dr. Amir in 2009 when I first came across his work.
Mr Amir accepted her as a patient for an initial assessment but admitted that he had never treated anyone in such a fragile state and that it may take time for a care plan to evolve in a safe and manageable way. He realised she had a hidden but serious jaw and orthodontic problem and suggested a course of treatment.
When the first fitting of the prescribed appliance took place the patient apparently collapsed when reacting to the substances of the device despite precautions of using hypoallergenic materials. Alternative materials to which she didn’t react were eventually found under some difficulties. The subsequent recovery process was steady and continuous however not a linear process and, on several occasions, my own medical interventions were required to steady her situation.
The uniqueness of the case which began from an almost hopeless starting position attracted the attention of a national newspaper. In an article written by editor Bella Freud, a society journalist the patient explained that the unique path she chose saved her life and that other patients with complex illnesses, allergies, or MChS could perhaps be helped in a similar way by accepting and understanding the influence that dentistry has on patients’ immune systems.
Meanwhile, I continued monitoring this patient and she has not relapsed since and has enjoyed a very full life for many years in the meantime.”
Again, the GDC head suppressed this information and held it back from the PCC.
My experience confirms that allergies are actually a different phenomenon than what is understood and practiced and when treated correctly almost all patients have recovered unlike medical treatments which have never worked permanently for anyone and the patients have to take lifelong medications especially in the hay fever season.
There are further links to articles on my website clearly showing recovery in patients who had no respite prior to having my interventions.
Eczema - A patients heart rending story
Holistic Dentistry for Allergies, Asthma, Skin Problems and Snoring By Dr Ann Harris reporting about her daughters recovery.
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge with absolutely no knowledge about the depth of this subject which goes far beyond current medical knowledge about allergies. The patients quoted had absolutely no respite with conventional medical treatment. The PCC had copies of all these articles but nothing stirred them into acting equitably.
iv. Sciatic nerve pains;
YES: It is pretty obvious that if the jaw causes the hip to go out of line often up to a 5 cm discrepancy in the hip levels, it is going to affect the sciatic nerve. I have a number of patients who recovered from this issue simply by correcting their jaws.
Apatient writes:
"I was born with one leg supposedly shorter than the other. I did not notice any problem with this until I was in my teens. My skirts were always lopsided and my trousers had to be shortened by 1 inch on the right leg. I also began to experience pain in my right hip, and so began many years of seeing doctors and physios - none of whom seemed to know what was wrong.
One afternoon whilst working in my office in the City the pain became intense and I was taken to the Royal London Hospital where a Consultant decided that this was obviously appendicitis. I had my appendix removed and was sent home. The pain returned and I was given an IVP [Intravenous Pyelogram] at my local hospital. The result was negative! Still the pain was there. Many years later after seeing a succession of physios I was becoming more and more lopsided as I walked.
One evening I was in an armchair at home and had so much difficulty in getting up that I decided this was enough. As luck would have it, my son was seeing Dr. Amir for another problem and I made an appointment to see him in the hope that he could do something for me. He was my saviour - 2 years later, after straightening my teeth and sorting my Atlas vertebra, I was free of pain for the first time in years. My posture was erect and I no longer have to adjust my trouser length - by 2 inches.
I am most grateful to Dr. Amir and would recommend anybody who is in pain, and cannot get satisfactory treatment elsewhere, to contact Dr. Amir for an appointment.
Valerie Page"
Drugs cannot correct body asymmetries.
The utter lack of a willingness to understand theh concepts listed on my website which all the PCC members had in their bundles and with little desire to get to the truth I was wrongfully suspended. The PCC failed to acknowledge or even attempt to understand a simple basic concept which causes most sciatic nerve pain and bring it to the attention of all dentists is a dis-service to all the patients who often suffer lifelong with such pains. The dentists are the key to ensure that what they do in the mouth does not cause hip asymmetry and possibly sciatic nerve pain.
Patients can formally sue the GDC if they develop sciatic nerve pains because the GDC/PCC has tried to suppress some extremely important information.
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge through total unwillingness to understand and get to the truth.
v. Breathing problems;
This is the most fundamental problem every patient faces no matter what their symptom or illness label is.
I have been putting this idea out for the last 20 years. Presently there is a best seller book on Amazon, written by James Nestor talking exactly about the jaw's relationship to breathing.
I demonstrated this to the hearing committee and patients spoke about it but this had no effect on their pre-ordained outcomes.
On every graph that I have produced a breathing problem is the major issue. These issues are behind almost any illness syndrome very many of which I have successfully treated by being able to restore the patients breathing patterns.
Please note the darker shadow which means a higher prevalence of the symptom. Please note that the breathing problem is the most intense issue amongst all subjects.
I physically demonstrated this jaw/breathing realtionship to the PCC and fail to find how they can call this charge "proven" Proven what?
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge through dysmal interest in patient welfare.
vi. Crohn’s/Coeliac disease; (Return to Arthritis)
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims. I have patient testimonies who recovered. Please remember no one ever recovers with conventional medicine and yet they are free to continue to deceive patients under the auspicious of the medical governing bodies. The adverse effects of the medicines create further serious healthh ptoblems requiring even more drugs with further ill effects. This is all acceptable to the GDC/PCC but an innocuous treament actually producing results is condemned.
I wrote an extensive ORIGINAL article on this subject “Rheumatoid arthritis and its relationship to gastric illnesses and jaw problems”.
There are no such associations listed anywhere in the medical literature and yet the GDC lawyer accused me that the material on my website was all “cut and paste” in his continued assault on the truth.
On reading my article a very senior person in the NHS wrote the following:
“Dear Dr Amir
Now that I understand the anatomy and physiology behind your findings and the impact it has on the body I recall many patients who I nursed over my many years within the NHS who exhibited such symptoms.
I worked with many rheumatology patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis who often complained of gastrointestinal problems such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), Ulcerative Colitis or other such diagnoses/symptoms.
There was never any understanding of the link between the two, in fact, I recall being told the gastrointestinal issues were likely linked to side effects of arthritis medication.
I hope individuals diagnosed with these conditions get the opportunity to receive your treatment and I will continue to try to influence the NHS to recognise this.
Mari Gay
Senior NHS Manager and Director
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge with zero knowledge or interest. My treatment for the first time ever gave almost 90% outcomes against ZERO outcomes by the medical profession. It is impossible to fathom our parents dying from gastric illness AND crippling Rheumatoid Arthritis and the PCC dares stamp on the possibilty that all this could be avoided for the elderly. There is no empathy left in the system that we are all imprisoned in.
vii. Depression and anxiety;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims. I have many patient testimonies from recovered patients.
It is an unequivocal finding that an asymmetric or misplaced jaw causes breathing problems. If this is coupled by a poor breathing technique of the upper body, especially the brain which ends up with poor blood and CFS perfusion leads to all kinds of problems including depression and anxiety which are relatively minor issues.
Furthermore, every single patient who attends with a chronic medically untreatable condition is bound to have depression and anxiety.
Imagine telling someone that they have an untreatable condition called “MS”, “CFS” or “Visual Snow” – all of which I have proven to be an utter scam, they are bound to get anxious, and depressed.
The moment they start recovering and see hope for the first time in their lives their depression and anxiety starts lifting. Breathing better also aids recovery massively.
The GDC has accused me of claiming a cure for Anxiety and Depression so have many pharmaceutical giants with vast amount of an Evidence Base - the scam of the modern world.
Here is what the BBC discovered:
"Paxil: Few SSRI antidepressants have the chequered safety profile of GlaxoSmithKline's (GSK) Paxil. In 2007 the BBC revealed that Paxil's Study 329 showed adolescents six times more likely to become suicidal on the drug but the results were buried. (GSK settled related charges in 2012 for $3 billion.) Rumours had circulated for years about suicide and toxic withdrawal symptoms with Paxil and they were evidently true in some cases.”
This is the life the GDC wants to condemn patients to instead of the simp;lest solution I have and proven beyond doubt.
.
The graph below shows the presence of depression and anxiety in numerous patients presenting with jaw problems and other symptoms.
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge deprecating and condemning patient to a lifetime of mental illness by making it difficult for me to spread the word. A tainted person is unlikely to attract the respect needed and that was perhaps the aim - not justice. I have close patient friends whose family members committed suicide through psychiatric medication. THe pain and hurt is intolerable. Shame on the GDC/PCC for depriving my patients of my services.
viii. Fibromyalgia;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims. I have patient testimonies who recovered.
Here is one posted only last week:
"Following a period of treatment with Dr Amir, my wife has totally recovered after almost 20 years of illness with Fibromyalgia that had left her unable to work despite the many medications she was prescribed. She lost the best years of her life and her situation appears to have been caused by a dentist pulling a number of her teeth out, effectively shrinking her jaw.
We have a very handicapped son and looking after both my son and my wife whilst going to work full time to earn a living has been quite an ordeal. Someone is responsible for our losses and the subsequent mental stress incurred.
I fail to understand why you, as a governing body, allow such treatment whilst condemning Dr Amir, a dentist who completely disagrees with the extraction of teeth. I can only perceive that you are a corrupt organisation that exists to prevent patients from obtaining proper treatment to recover and be free of the shackles of chronic illness.
I sincerely hope that a high court judge will see the truth, ban you from your evil agenda and restore Dr Amir's reputation, which it appears you have gone out of your way to destroy. "
I have written extensively about this subject. It is a concocted illness. Please read my article: "Symptoms" and "Conditions" - an insight. This article uses Fibromyalgia as the core “illness” for discussion. Using the same graph as I have used elsewhere one can see how a group of symptoms caused by jaw dysfunction have been extracted to create a new illness. Some 800,000 people in this country are off work because of this label and the medical and social cost of this scam is immeasurable.
 
The graph illustrates how a group of symptoms caused by TMJD are extracted and lumped together to create a scam illness. It has to be so because when one treats their YMJD their symptoms start evaporating.
Another “ Fibromyalgia” patient writes:
"I have been ill for 27 years suffering from extreme exhaustion and severe muscle and joint pain. I have had numerous diagnoses such as CFS & Fibromyalgia & Arthritis (Sjögren’s syndrome), hypermobility and depression. Having come across your website and various blog posts I am now wondering if this is all related to my pains and a Jaw which locks that I have had for many years. Hoping that you can help………
The patient further adds, "I have suffered for 27 years with chronic exhaustion & severe muscle and joint pains. I first became ill following a bad viral infection aged 22 during my pregnancy with my daughter. Despite exhaustive tests and multiple different diagnoses from many different medical professionals I remain locked in a cycle of pain and exhaustion, unable to work and left with no alternatives but to rely on ever stronger pain relief."
After a few months into treatment the patient reports:
“My mind is now clearer and my emotions less dulled down, this brings a sadness that for so many years, such heavy medication has been stopping much-needed energy from coming through.
I am still on Morphine patches for pain relief which I intend to start reducing in the coming weeks and a low dose anti-depressant that was prescribed to relax my muscles at night. I am sure that with your continued help and as your treatment continues in the coming months that I will finally be free from all these nasty prescription drugs which have actually contributed to my condition.
My visits to you continue to be the highlight of my month and I remain hopeful that your treatment has set me on the road to full recovery from serious long-term health problems.”
At the hearing her husband gave a very heart-rending report of his wife recovery from Fibromyalgia after 27 years of suffering but it had absolutely no effect on the PCC's conclusion that I had made false claims about Fibromyalgia and suspending me.
The GDC actions have prevented me from completing her treatment and that of many other patients and wrongly defamed me right round the world.
There are 800,000 pateints entrapped into this fraudulent diagnoses who cannot go to work and costing society billions. These scams do not bother the GDC but if someone has a simple cure the GDC's duty appears to be to pounce upon them and shut them down.
I have a 100% success rate while medicine has a 0% success rate. Can one imagine that the later is more acceptable to the GDC/PCC. Ghastly, and an enemy of the general public is the way I picture after their ill gotten perverted conclusions seriously harming patient welfare. Such establishments need to be shut down. THe government closes whole cardiac surgery departments when some figures show a slight uptrend in unexplained deaths. Here millions are dying cruel deaths, the perpetrators go unpunished but get awarded professorships and if someone finds a simple solution he gets hung. How can this GDC/PCC system be allowed to continue?
ix. Infertility;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims. In my article Infertility - A much needed solution I have 3 patients stories who became pregnant and went on to have children.
There is nothing unusual about it. I attribute inadequate gynaecological function of any description to:
1) A misaligned jaw which affects breathing both in the manner of breathing and the quantity of air taken in.
2) This produces inadequate pumping of the gut by the diaphragm followed by an inadequate pumping of the pelvic diaphragm which causes improper functioning of the gynaecological system giving rise to all kinds of problems including infertility.
3) In previous answers I have mentioned hip asymmetry which also corrects itself allowing proper lower abdominal function. Hip symmetry is crucial for proper pelvic function.
At the hearing the GDC "nonexpert" giving "expert" evidence pulled up a pargraph from my consent form which
almost all my patients have read on starting treatment which says in bold:
"Female patients who normally do not need contraception to avoid pregnancy are warned that symmetry in the jaws brings about symmetry in the pelvic area. This often restores normal reproductive function. Contraception to avoid pregnancy is called for during and after treatment."
I put this sentence there meaning exactly what I wanted to warn female patients about. I first wrote this some 20 years ago. I remembered some patient suing their doctor for becoming pregnant and the doctor had to compensate for the upbringing of this unwanted child. Presently the situation is even more dire many people do not want to have a child as they just cannot afford to do so.
I was roight as at least three patients became pregnant who WANTED to without me ever having mentioned this subject to them. However the GDC "expert" made out that it was a ploy by me to entice women into treatment and the PCC believed him. SO giving a fair warning to patients can backfire and a dentist can be suspended for his honesty.
When Bella Freud wrote the newspaper article we had about 2000 calls in two weeks and I still get calls. All my life I have never been shot of patients. I have turned away more patients than I have accepted over the years.
My treatment corrects three major hurdles in women trying to get pregnant. I never advertised this fact or made any such claims anywhere before. Just because there were three pateint stories on my website I was charged with this "misrepresentation".
NOW I DO MAKE A CLAIM THAT YES, BODILY ASYMMETRIES ARE A MAJOR CAUSE OF INFERTLITY.
I also had sworn witness statements from patients.
A university professor writes:
“A 30 something male, I visited Dr. Amir with chronic neck pain (among other symptoms). Felt much better very quickly with the treatment and much healthier, in general, these days, treatment ongoing. Have really been amazed at the treatment having tried loads of other things in the past... anyway during one visit I mentioned to Dr. Amir the difficulties my partner and I had been having conceiving, including an unsuccessful IVF attempt. He said that some women struggling to conceive had managed to do so following his treatment (although they were being treated for other issues)... And so, we thought we'd give it a go even if we were sceptical (neck pain is one thing...!)... so, my partner who thought she was otherwise pretty healthy visited Dr. Amir. He noticed that her breathing was restricted and fitted her for a brace... she felt as if she could breathe with greater ease as soon as she wore the brace and had more energy. She also noticed pretty quickly that her periods changed (in a healthy way)... within 4 months she was pregnant. Our beautiful son Teo is now 5 months old!”
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge created from three testimonials. So if a dentist publishes three testimonials from say, headache patients who recovered through dentistry than the GDC WILL charge you with advertising the fact that you can cure headaches and suspend you!. What a disgustingly low point have we reached?
xi. Arthritis;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims. Please refer to my answer to “vi. Crohn’s/Coeliac disease” above.
Again, a malicious unsubstantiated charge due tio thorough incompetency..
xii. Learning difficulties;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims.
Learning difficulty problems have been scientifically associated with cerebellar dysfunction.
An abstract Cited in Cerebellum by Mitchell J. says:
"Cerebellar dysfunction is evident in several developmental disorders, including autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and developmental dyslexia, and damage to the cerebellum early in development can have long-term effects on movement, cognition, and affective regulation. “
I have testimonials and explanations on my website. I have explained extensively how a jaw asymmetry causes the occiput to become unlevel and the first vertebra, the Atlas:
(i) Rotates forward causing the occiput to become unlevel;
(ii) Results in an asymmetric flow of blood to the cerebellum and consequential problems with behaviour and learning difficulties supported by the link above.
The proof of me surmising this and a confirmation that I am correct is in these testimonials which are on my website:
“................Now many years later I am self-sufficient. I have my own web site tombestcraft.com. I learnt a lot more at an amazing college I went to called Ruskin Mill.
As well as that I am now playing for the England international disability cricket team this is because of hard work and support from friends and my family and Dr. Amir who all helped change my life
Now looking at life from a perspective where I am aware of my faculties and surroundings I note how impossible it was for me to do anything before. My mind just could not function correctly. I was all confused and single minded.
I have been at the other side where life was all doom and gloom but I was not aware of it. I could not read or write. Now I can do both. I am nearly 30 and life could not be better.” Source: https://dramir.com/blog/archives/42-AutismLearning-DifficultiesOCD-and-Behavioural-problems.html
Testimonial 2):
“ Dr Amir had told me from the start of my treatment way back in 2015 that a healthy mind was all about oxygen intake. It’s been 19 or so months since Hassan began his treatment and I was both a keen observer but also sceptical from the start. I always bore in mind EXACTLY how Hassan was at the very BEGINNING of the treatment so I could compare and contrast it to what he is now. And I can definitely say that he’s far more sociable, his vocabulary has increased tenfold, he’s far more empathic then he ever was and he’s definitely a lot smarter too. In fact, contrary to what his teachers believed was possible, he’s now an aspiring chef and will be looking for full-time employment, instead of being a burden on society once his sixth-form is complete. He’s already made major strides by completing work experience at the Green Man community hub as a budding chef.”
Andrew B. February 2019
Source: Autism - From Oblivion to Resurrection
The patients strangely recover extremely rapidly. I have had other patients but since the GDC started its harassment I stopped accepting many more that I could have easily helped and changed their lives PERMANENTLY.
The connivance at the GDC in preventing me from working, has jeopardised the chances of thousands coming out of oblivion and living normal lives. The social and medical costs that could be saved which all the tax payers pay cannot even begin to be counted.
THERE IS NO OTHER MODALTY OF CARE THAT COULD HELP THESE PATIENTS TO RISE FROM THE ASHES SO RAPIDLY.
Again, A caring “patient protecting” façade of the GDC is nothing more than a dangerous organisation perpetuating illness in society and the charge against me nefarious.
xiii. A migraine;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims. I probably have had a 90%+ success rate as against ZERO by the medical establishment working under EBM.
My first patient recovered some 45 years ago. On finding about my predicament she wrote on the Internet:
Shocked to hear how Dr Amir has been treated
“I was shocked to hear of the suspension of Dr Amir by the GDC. I have been a patient since 1983. I was rushed to Accident and Emergency with severe headaches at the age of 23 where I spent weeks in hospital, having tests and on a significant amount of medication.
I had permanent headaches, no energy and felt permanently unwell. I would wake in the morning with my jaw locked. I would spend Monday to Friday in hospital and home at the weekend. One weekend, after being in hospital for 6 weeks, I had a tooth ache and my sister suggested I go and see Dr Amir.
Within 30 minutes of meeting him, he discovered the reasons for my headaches. My fillings had been replaced by a previous dentist, under a general anaesthetic and my jaw had become out of sync. Dr Amir, over the next few weeks, replaced my fillings and made a special brace for me to wear.
Within days of meeting him I started to feel better. Over the last 38 years he has been a fantastic dentist to my husband and two children. We all have so much confidence in him and his ability to solve any dental problems. He cares with a passion about his patients and always will see us a short notice, out of surgery hours when needed. The thought of not having Dr Amir to help us when we need him, fills us with dread. Do the right thing GDC and reinstate Dr Amir. “
This was some 40 years ago. Since then at the very least 50 patients must have recovered from chronic migraines.
I have also written about this subject on my website: Migraines, headaches and tinnitus - Jaw asymmetry or a medical problem - you decide.
The GDC’s sole agenda has been to discredit and defame me - nothing to do with justice. I have proven that I have spoken the truth written the truth and supported by witnesses and yet they found me guilty and suspended me. Any judge in any court of law would be shocked to read about such miscarraige of justice.
.
This charge against me, in the presence of evidence which the PCC had at hand, is again nefarious.
xiv. Multiple Sclerosis;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims.
I have written extensively about this subject. This is where my criticism of the neurologists comes in and for their deceptive diagnoses and fraudulent medications. I have blown the whistle on them. The GDC found it opportune to employ one of them so that he can hang me. Again no impartiality simply trying to pervert the course of justice. Get someone who will get me convicted!
.
Strangely, I discovered the neurologists admitting their deception. and misleading yjousands of patients sucked into Multiple Sclerosis fraudulently.. I claimed this in open court at the GDC and it is a matter of public record. I have seen too many MS patients being tortured by their medications and deceptions.
Here is a quote from what the chief neurologist says on one of his monthly newsletters:
“#MSBlog MS is emotionally exhausting! Posted: 14 Feb 2013 03:43 AM PST
“The realisation that the DMTs have failed leads to the re-emergence of grief and the five emotional stages that go with it. The anger is more often than not directed at the medical team for being impotent to stop the disease; exposing our false promises, which were made to give you hope. As a result of being an outspoken critic of therapeutic nihilism - the blight of our profession - a proponent of early aggressive treatment and a disciple for the active and holistic management of MS, I seem to be taking more flak than most. It is emotionally exhausting!...................."
"................It helps you understand why MSers turn to alternative theories, and treatments, when science and modern medicine lets you down."
This is a deception admitted by the chief neurologist at ST Barts. Hospital.
Need I say anymore?
An article appeared in the Evening Standard about 13 years ago written by the society journalist Bella Freud where Bella had interviewed my first MS patient who had recovered from MS. We had 2,000 phone calls in the ensuing fortnight from patients and still get such calls. TPleaeclick here to read the article How a dental brace could cure MS, migraines and paralysis
Subsequently many more patients recovered. Some of them are listed in a number of articles on my website.
This is the same graph as earlier showing symptoms caused by jaw asymmetry. I have marked the symptoms which the neurologists attribute to a concocted “auto-immune disease whereby the immune system attacks the patients’ myelin sheath”.
Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the diagnoses is there to sell anti immune drugs at a cost of some £20K to "40k per patient per year, to kill the immune system. Hence no recovery takes place and many die because of the drugs but in the meantime the drugs have earnt the companies billions.
Treating the jaw rapidly starts relieving the patients symptoms especially if they are seen as soon as they are diagnosed.
Here is the experience of a family with a 12-year old patient who was suckered into 'MS' after he reported with a numb leg (and an earlier unrelated episode 5 years earlier).
He had been off school for a year and was being injected every 3rd day with one of the Disease Modifying Therapies (DMT's) - meaning immune system killing drugs.
He soon developed liver damage (because of the DMT’s) and was diagnosed with "Auto immune liver disease" also.
He completely recovered after embarking on symmetry treatment. He was back at school within a couple of weeks.
His parents did not inform the prescribing hospital about having stopped the injections. After 4 months he was tested and completely cleared of 'MS' and miraculously also of the 'autoimmune liver disease' with the following good news:
"The Beta interferon has completely cleared your 'MS' and your auto immune liver disease and we are going to change your drug now!"
He was not taking any drug but only symmetry treatment!
A malicious charge by the GDC in spite of hearing oral testimony from am prominent witness and reading dozens of testimonials on my website. Where is the crime for you to have the audacity to convict me and deprive 700,000 patients in the country any sense of relief.
xv. Heart palpitations;
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims.
This is the most basic problem that many patients experience. Others may have hyperthyroidism or menopausal symptoms which can cause palpitations and or Supra Ventricular Tachycardia (SVT) but if one excludes these causes, palpitations occur because of a poor breathing pattern and inadequate oxygenation because of jaw issues.
Most patients suffering from palpitations do chest breathing:
a) This makes the heart having to fight with the lungs to adequately pump blood..
b) The jaw dysfunction also decreases the amount of oxygen intake.
Therefore, in the presence of poor oxygenation and poor technique the heart has to work harder and the beats increase and so does the force of the beat which the patient experiences as palpitations.
The treatment is to simply increase the amount of oxygenation by correcting the jaws and teaching the patient belly breathing. The palpitations disappear almost from the word go.
Many patients suffer lifelong and many are prescribed beta blockers which on average kill 200,000 people in Europe and the USA each year!
A little knowledge is dangerous. Convicting me helps boost their pathetic egos in the absence of any crime committed.
Again a malicious charge. The PCC and all the GDC cronies had no undertanding of the subject so decided to find me guilty again in the absnece of any crime.xvi. Speech difficulties, including stammering.
YES: I am a 100% correct. There is no misleading or dishonesty in my claims.
I have had patients who recovered almost instantaneously as soon as they were fitted with a corrective dental appliance.
I explained that stammering has to do with inadequate breathing ability. I have had cases where the patients could not utter a word for a full 15 seconds and he recovered. The information was with the GDC and the PCC. They were not bothered with patient testimony or my explanation and simply ram raided into the guilty verdict.
The PCC had access to this testimonial. We were prepared to call the witness and his medical doctor in to substantiate my claim but the PCC ignored any such thought or did not demand the evidence and went on to find me guilty.
Most patients recover on the first day they get the appliance in the mouth but here is a testimonial of one serious case of stammering:
Recovery from Stammering
“I met Dr Amir by chance at another mutual friends’ medical office. I was treating a patient and Dr Amir noticed my intense difficulty in getting to form a sentence due to my stammer. He offered point blank to fix it for me!
When Dr Amir told me he could help me with my stammering I was sceptical. For more than forty years I have tried very many approaches to overcoming stammering, from one to one speech therapy, hypnosis, meditation, ‘prolonged speech’ in the 1970’s to the ‘Starfish’ programme a decade ago. I know that these approaches have worked for some but not for me. I had become resigned to life as a stammerer.
It is almost a year since I first met Dr Amir and was fitted with my first brace. From the beginning I remember a sense of spaciousness in my mouth which felt remarkably liberating. 3 or 4 months into the treatment, as my teeth continued to move, I noticed a marked increase in my energy levels and friends began to comment on my improved fluency of speech. It felt too good to be true!
Part of my work is as a teacher and the amount of energy expended to maintain any level of fluency during a workshop was such that I would be drained after a day of teaching and exhausted after a weekend intensive. I began to believe in the reality of my improvement when I came through a weekend workshop I was teaching having barely stammered at all and feeling exhilarated. Family, friends and colleagues have all commented on my fluency without any prompting from me.
There is an increase in confidence around my ability to speak fluently: I recently became aware of a willingness on my part to initiate small talk, a pastime so excruciatingly frustrating and difficult for me in the past that I have avoided it for most of my life. I now pass the time of day with strangers with barely a hint of a stammer and I am sufficiently confident to be able to spice up the interaction with some humour. I have workshops scheduled throughout 2012 and I am planning to give public talks about the work I do. I feel liberated! I will keep you posted as to how I am getting on.
Alongside an improvement in speech fluency there have been other benefits which I believe have occurred as a result of Dr Amir’s treatment. In 2007 a tumour on my spine paralysed my legs and in 2008 further tumours paralysed my pelvic area. Prior to starting Dr Amir’s treatment, I had, to a great extent, regained the ability to walk but still had minimal sensation in my pelvic region which profoundly affected my quality of life. Over the last few months sensation has returned to a great extent in that area and, as previously reported, my energy levels are far greater than they were a year ago.”
Again, a malicious unjust accusation and verdict.
And here comes the crunch after all those deceitful malicious unjust accusations none of which hold any weight:
And that, in consequence of the matters set out above, your fitness to practise is impaired by reason of misconduct.”
The misconduct has been carried out by the GDC by suspending me for no evidence of any dishonesty or misrepresentation depriving patients from getting proper treatment as amply explained above and trying to suppress proven and workable treatments which beat any other modality of care.
The misconduct is rife at the GDC. They are not impaired but active in their injudicious prejudices.
When I first got my charge sheet with some 20 charges of poor note keeping, I immediately started phoning around if there was any course I could take along with my staff. There was only one course available costing £600. I immediately sih=gned up for it.
Guess who turned up to give me the course. The case examiner who had charged me at the GDC
I was wondering why I have so many charges, many repeated over and others where she already had the evidence that the charge will not take hold, Now I konw the reason. She swindles the dentists by giving them the courses afterwards. Any judge in the whole country would throw the whole case out on just this technicality. I believe this person is still employed at the GDC in spite of them finding out about this criminal activity. Well my dear readers this is the end of the GDC charges against me.
I fully admit that my note keeping could have been better and spent thousands on immediately getting a new computerised system and paid for a course a week after I was charged given by the person who charged me in the first place at the GDC.
The whole case is defunct, unjust, lacks credibility, shows stark institutionalised racism, and convictions for no crime committed.
It also shows how evil those who pretend to protect the public are and how people are prevented from getting off drugs and start living a normal life. We need class actions against the GDC on many levels. All the patients who have had dental extractions and then gone onto develop lifelong illness need to litigate against the GDC.
If you are my patient and because of this nefarious suspension you should also get together a class action against the GDC. We are dealing with evil. kind words will not work. They will do their utmost to shut my website down do please save all the pages and spread it all over the internet throughout the world. Dentists must read what they are up againsy when they cross paths with this outfit. #
This case confirms their contemptuous behaviour and they are the ones needing punishment for depriving thousands of patients of proper care all around the country.
Dishonesty is practiced by the GDC and all its gangs of cronies who did not bother to read the 1000 pages of my website and paid scant regard to the welfare of cripplingly sick patients who have recovered or were recovering. The GDC has ram raided and purposefully perverted the course of justice to arrive at conclusions that have absolutely no validity in any court of law.
No wonder hundreds of patients have given the GDC Zero ratings on the Internet. It is the first time in the history of any governing body that they have received so much flak from so many very ill patients. Some one is going to have to listen to their cries for help.
The GDC regularly destroys the lives of many dentists for the slightest infractions especially if they are non-white.
A posting on the GDC website reflects my experience with this most unprofessional group.
I know that the witness statements were spiced up at the GDC and I have to show that it was indeed the case.I am not going to let them get away with anything. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The saga continues: (Here Ms Amir is my defence representative, Mr Stevens is the GDC lawyer)
Ms Amir stated, therefore, that the only issues that are in dispute between the parties as to their admissibility are: the [patient] witness statements that you seek to admit as evidence, to which the GDC objects;
the majority of paragraph 23 of the second report from a GDC expert witness, namely Professor I B; [a maxillo facial surgeon who had zilch idea about my subject and also the other illnesses that he was giving "expert" advice on like "Multiple Sclerosisi"] and the redactions to the witness [hearsay] statement of a witness called by the GDC , who is the former partner of the patient in this case and who is referred to for the purposes of these proceedings as Witness 1, between paragraphs 12 to 21, to which the GDC objects. [Meaning that the GDC wants total hearsay evidence of a disgruntled ex-wife to be admitted as evidence.]
Ms Amir set out your position on the issue of whether the witness statements that you propose to adduce are admissible. Ms Amir stated that the witness statements in question are relevant to the allegation of dishonest conduct that you face.< [There was never any allegation of dishonesty other than that manufactured by the disgruntled ex-wife.] Ms Amir therefore submitted that those witness statements should be admitted as evidence.
Ms Amir then set out your position on the issue of why the extracts of the evidence of Professor Brook and Witness 1 are not admissible. Ms Amir stated that in his second report Professor Brook < [a maxillo facial surgeon with absolutely no clue about my speciality nor all the illnesses that my treatment successfully addresses]> goes beyond the role and remit of an expert witness and that he is not able to provide expert testimony on the matters to which paragraph 23 of his second report refers. Ms Amir therefore submitted that such evidence should not be admitted as evidence.
Ms Amir also submitted that the evidence of Witness 1 that appears between paragraphs 12 to 21 of that witness’ witness statement consists of multiple hearsay and as such should not be admitted as evidence. Ms Amir stated that Patient A is due to give evidence, and that such evidence is more capable of assisting the Committee.
Mr Stevens then addressed the Committee in relation to the evidence that you seek to adduce with which the GDC takes issue, and in respect of the evidence that the GDC intends to rely upon which you contend should not be admitted.
Mr Stevens stated that the GDC objects to the numerous witness statements provided by you on the basis that none of those witness statements are relevant to the heads of charge in defence of which it understands you seek to adduce such evidence. [Just imagine the GDC wants to charge me with misrepresenting various illness labels but does not want the PCC to hear out the witnesses who recovered and on whose reovery the articles are based on my website.]
These heads of charge concern allegations that you made certain statements on a website which were misleading and dishonest. [Not one statement was misleading or dishonest and proven beyond doubt in my answers earlier on here]
There is no statement which is misleading or dishonest whatsoever on my website. I still stand by every word that I wrote. Hundreeds of patients have written on the Internet supporting the truth of my statements. The patient witness statements are the evidence to mitigate the GDC’s unfounded and unsupported allegations that any misleading or dishonest statements were ever made on my website. So for the GDC to object to hearing the witnesses under oath was an attempt to pervert the course of justice.
In relation to the evidence that the GDC seeks to adduce to which you have objected, Mr Stevens submitted that the evidence objected to from Professor Brook as described above is fair and relevant to the charges that you face, and that as such it should be admitted. This is an expert witness who neither has any knowledge about my subject nor the titles of all the illnesses that I was deceptively charged with. This was proven beyond doubt as the hearing continued.
The maxillo facial "experts" do not keep any long-term record of the outcomes of their wisdom tooth extraction treatments and thus have no knowledge that half the patients develop some lifelong serious illness and my expose was used by the GDC to appoint such an expert so that to save his own neck he will do his best to destroy me.
He must have read all the reports ad successes of numerous illnesses but with held all favourable reports from the PCC. The PCC also had 1000 pages of my website for five years and I feel never bothered to read it. They arrived at an unjust conclusion. Hundreds of patients have written on the GDC Website (Many postings were removed) and on Trustpilot and various other governmental websites including the PSA.
Continuing:
Mr Stevens also submitted that, in respect of your objections to specific parts of the witness statement of Witness 1, that it is fair and relevant for such evidence to be admitted, notwithstanding whether such issue is hearsay. Mr Stevens also stated that the GDC intends to call Witness 1 to give oral evidence, and that therefore the witness’ evidence can be tested.
The Committee first considered whether the witness statements that you seek to adduce should be admitted as evidence. The Committee considers that patients who have provided their opinion on the treatment that they have received from you, as set
out in those witness statements, might go towards its consideration of your state of mind. [Not to seek the truth about my claims and patient benefits but the "state of my mind".]
I do not know where this “state of mind“ nonsense was im[osed into the hearing. Was it their intention to apportion my work as that of a lunatic?
What comes to mind is the treatment of intelligentsia in the stalinist soviet union. Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia:
"The "anti-Soviet" political behavior of some individuals – being outspoken in their opposition to the authorities, demonstrating for reform, and writing critical books [websites now] – were defined simultaneously as criminal acts and symptoms of mental illness (e.g., "delusion of reformism"), and susceptible to a ready-made diagnosis (e.g., "sluggish schizophrenia"). Within the boundaries of the diagnostic category, the symptoms of pessimism, poor social adaptation and conflict with authorities were themselves sufficient for a formal diagnosis of "sluggish schizophrenia."
...... The KGB routinely sent dissenters to psychiatrists for diagnosing to avoid embarrassing public trials and to discredit dissidence as the product of ill minds. Highly classified government documents which have become available after the dissolution of the Soviet Union confirm that the authorities consciously used psychiatry as a tool to suppress dissent."
I am not dissenting merely expressing my findings with 90% success rates which the GDC cannot stomach. So they tried to find a reason to send me to a Gulag. I detest this turn of events at the hands of the illiterates about my subject that permeate all levels of the GDC. This is a slanderous statement and its incorporation into public evidence is extremely damaging to my worldwide raputation.
Many articles are original resulting from successes in the treatment of conditions which no one in the world has ever been able to fix previously. The disgustingly inept GDC/PCC has the gall to apportion it to a mental deficit.
Continuing:
In making the statements that you are alleged to have made. The PCC calls telling the truth "alleged statements". The Committee is not persuaded that these statements are not relevant to the heads of charge that you face concerning your alleged statements on a website, and your state of mind in so doing, and it therefore considers that it would be fair for those witness statements to be admitted as evidence. [Yes, call the truthful statements as "charges". If anyone needs psychiatric evaluation it was the memebers of all thiose involved in the criminal conspiracy to convict me no matter what the truth.
The committee agreed to admit my witness statements while the all “patient caring” GDC did not want the truth to be shown. WE submitted 29 sworn testimonies covering all illnesses that I was charged with. My legal representative told the committee that we have enough witnesses to cover a full year of testimonies which would totally vindivcate me but they only agred to hear five witnesses whose testimony was eventua;;yy totally ignored. They were in fact accused of misleading me by tellinhg me that they had recovered with my treatm,ent. The GDC expert thought that some success was a placebo effect. A total insult to the hunfdreds of my reovered patients.
The Committee next considered whether it should admit certain passages of Professor Brook’s second report about comments that you are alleged to have made on a website. The Committee considers that such evidence is fair and relevant. [In spite of the fact that this professor has absolutely no knowledge of my treatment modality nor does he have any knowledge of the other illnesses which I have successfully treated while medicine has utterly failed.]
The Committee considers that Professor Brook is entitled to comment on any relationship between dentistry and the specified medical conditions. These matters appear to fall within his knowledge and experience, and his comments have been made within his remit as an expert witness, drawing on his knowledge and experience.
So this maxillofacial surgeon is an expert in:
Asthma;
Ataxia;
Allergies;
Sciatic nerve pains;
Breathing problems;
Crohn’s/Coeliac disease;
Depression and anxiety;
Fibromyalgia;
Infertility
Arthritis
Learning difficulties
Migraines
Multiple Sclerosis
and Heart palpitations.
It is shocking that even specialists in each of these subjects would be hesitant in commenting about another speciality.
Here we have a PCC which has accepted an individual who has probably never come across many of these illnesses as an omnipresent "expert" witness, affecting the lives of millions in the country. This ubiquitous un-emapathetic conclusion deserves the utmost derision.
I do not know how this or any maxillofacial surgeon WHO ARE the cause of illness in a huge number of cases can possibly have any such knowledge. I have consistently condemned maxillofacial surgeons for extracting wisdom teeth which leads to serious jaw problems and lifelong illness in at least half the patients. Please read my article on wisdom teeth.
The GDC specifically selected an such an expert solely on the intent that he will take me to task to save his own skin. The committee’s acceptance of such incompetent expertise is a grave injustice.
This professor treats jaw problems in a certain way (which never works) and I treat in a different way. Justice would have been the appointment of an independent scientist with no affiliations to impartially give an opinion. Instead the GDC ensured that the odds were stacked high against me at the outset.
This professor never mentioned any of my successes nor did he try and talk to any of the hundreds of patients who had recovered through my treatments, but ram raided to suit the GDC where he regularly works and earns phenomenal amounts of money.
The rest of the hearing committees also regularly work for the GDC and they are all ally pally with each other. The chances of getting a fair hearing at the GDC is almost nil.
The Committee next considered whether to admit the specified passages of the evidence of Witness 1. The Committee considers that such evidence is relevant and that it is fair for such evidence to be admitted. The Committee notes that such
evidence may constitute hearsay, but it has reminded itself that the hearsay nature of such evidence is not of itself a bar to admissibility.
The Committee considers that it would be assisted by receiving such evidence. [The hearsay evidence is from a disgruntled ex-wife who had never been seen by me nor did the husband ever share any information with her. This is clearly stated in her own testimony. The PCC might as well have called someone off the street and make all kinds of allegations and they would have heard it. Such nonsense is inadmissible in a proper court of law but a feature of kangaroo courts which I had the misfortune to face.]
The Committee has therefore determined to admit all the evidence in question.
They are talking about admitting hearsay evidence from a disgruntled wife undergoing divorce proceedings worried about her husband spending his money on personal welfare instead of sharing it with her. I had never seen this person nor did she ever accompany her husband. The son and husband were shocked to find that she had written to the GDC and were extremely angry.
They were also going to admit all the evidence of a non expert maxillofacial surgeon.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The next section pertains to evidence prepared by me during the night to show published scientific evidence that different organ systems relate to each other and have scientifically been shown to cause symptoms interdependently.
There is no published evidence that the dental asymmetry can cause sciatic nerve pain but there is evidence to show that the jaw can cause back pain; that back pain can lead to hip pain; and hip pain can be associated with sciatic nerve pain.
I had shown interlinkages which the professor accepted were demonstrated in the articles but refused to acknowledge that there was a direct linkage with the jaw and the manifestation of even neck pain.
The professor lacked the most basic knowledge that neck pain is linked to jaw problems. Every graph I have shown anywhere will show the presence of neck pain in every case I have seen for jaw dysfunction. Indeed neck pain is THE main feature of all patients. The heavy black dots both in the jaw bar and the neck pain bar confirm that neck pain is a feature of jaw asymmetry ALWAYS.
Please also note that attending to the jaw dysfunction is the only way to resolve all other symptoms. Attending to the other symptoms either resolves them temporarily or not at all. “Mr Amir At the conclusion of the GDC’s factual case Ms Amir submitted that there is no case for you to answer in respect of heads of charge 6 (a) and 6 (b). Ms Amir made her submission pursuant to Rules 19 (2) and (3) of the General Dental Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2006 (‘the Rules’). She submitted that there is insufficient evidence to support the contention that you stated to Patient A that the treatment that you were able to provide would either slow or improve Patient A’s symptoms of spinalcerebellar ataxia (‘SCA3’). Ms Amir submitted that neither Patient A nor Witness 2 has given evidence of you making such comments to Patient A. Ms Amir submitted that as such the Committee could not properly find the facts alleged at heads of charge 6 (a) and 6 (b) proved.
So the patient and his son made it clear that i HAD MADE NO SUCH STATEMENT THAT i COULD CURE HIS SCA
Mr Stevens argued against the submission and stated that the GDC has adduced sufficient evidence for the Committee to find the facts alleged at heads of charge 6 (a) and 6 (b) proved.
6 (a) the treatment you were able to provide would slow Patient A’s symptoms of Spinal Cerebellar Ataxia or words to that effect;
6 (b) the treatment you were able to provide would improve Patient A’s
symptoms of Spinal Cerebellar Ataxia or words to that effect;
None of this was ever mentioned by me. The only terms ever used were “walking ability” as demonstrated to the patient and his son. He was in fact discouraged from imagining that he would recover sufficiently to go back to work.
Promises of improvements in walking ability are also discouraged in the written consent form given to the patient which he had signed:
“Having worked on such patients for many years it appears that most symptoms resolve but the walking disability produces mixed results. I do not have the means to discover what the hindrance is and perhaps in time we will find a solution but in the meantime please do not expect much in terms of improvements in your walking disability.”
In the presence of prima facie evidence which the patient had signed the GDC spent about a million pounds and six years to try and convict me on hearsay which NEVER ever took place. It was NOT the assertion of the patient or his son.
Mr Stevens submitted in particular that, whilst the evidence presented does not include a specific quote, there is evidence to support the allegations contained at those heads of charge.
Mr Stevens also stated that t he heads of charge that you face do not contain alleged quotes that you may have made, but that the heads of charge instead allege that you made certain statements, or words to the effect of those statements.
Mr Stevens submitted that the absence of evidence of a quote is not therefore fatal to the charge.
Mr Stevens submitted that the evidence of Patient A and Witness 2 is a sufficient basis for the facts alleged at heads of charge 6 (a) and 6 (b) to be found proved, and that as such the Committee would be able to find the facts alleged at those heads of charge proved. [Patient A and witness 2 never made any such accusation.]
The Committee has been careful not to determine the facts, but instead has considered whether it could find the facts alleged at heads of charge 6 (a) and 6 (b) proved in due course once properly directed as to the facts.
The Committee has determined that at this stage there is some evidence [Where? The only evidence is that such statements were denied by the two ,ain witnesses] to support the facts alleged at heads of charge 6 (a) and 6 (b).
The Committee notes the written and oral evidence of Patient A and Witness 2 in relation to the heads of charge. It therefore considers that this evidence means that it could find the facts alleged proved. Accordingly, the Committee rejects the submission of no case to answer.”
As per the submissions of my legal representative on reading the written statements and hearing the oral testimonies:
1) There was no accusation verbal or written by the patient.
2) There was no accusation verbal or written by the son.
3) My nurse who was present testified that no such promise was ever made.
4) Promises of improvements in walking ability are also discouraged in the written consent form given to the patient which he had signed:
“Having worked on such patients for many years it appears that most symptoms resolve but the walking disability produces mixed results. I do not have the means to discover what the hindrance is and perhaps in time we will find a solution but in the meantime please do not expect much in terms of improvements in your walking disability.”
5) I had personally dissuaded him from expecting too much in terms of improvements in his walking ability which the son had confirmed to the PCC.
In the presence of prima facie evidence which the patient had signed the GDC spent about a million pounds and six years to try and convict me on hearsay evidence of a disgruntled ex-wife. One would think that we were sitting in some jungle territory but this is happening at the cradle of civilisation, a kangaroo court in our midst decided that it could find the facts alleged proved and went right ahead casing me some six years of harrassement.!
Dentists, be warned that the odds are stacked heavily against you if a patient makes the slightest complaint. I had no complaint against me from the patients and yet they destroyed my career and disrupted the lives of very many very ill patients who should all launch a class action against the GDC/PCC for pain and suffering.
At the start of proceedings on 5 March 2020 Ms Amir informed the Committee that shortly after the end of proceedings on the preceding day Mr Amir had experienced health difficulties which have caused him to be hospitalised. Ms Amir stated that Mr Amir may not be well enough to reattend the hearing to continue his evidence for the next few days. Ms Amir invited the Committee to allow her to interpose other defence witnesses, including Mr Amir’s dental nurse, who is referred to for the purposes of these proceedings as Witness 4, and other patients who have received care and treatment from Mr Amir.
This was the development of Atrial fibrillation and my implanted ICD shocking me twice soon after I gave evidence and I had to be hospitalised.
My health deteriorated soon after this saga began and deteriorated precipitously for the next couple of years as they put me through this vindictive process and unjustly suspending me when there was never a case to answer. They even stopped me from doing general dentistry where I have a MAsters degree and I am a highly skilled dental technician. I have had crowns, bridges, root fillings, other restorations which have hardly ever gone wrong in 40 years and no patient has ever complained about the quality of my work. For a Kangaroo court to have such wide reaching powers is a travesty of justice.
After the above incidence my heart was constantly fibrillating at 150 bpm for three months or so after which I was admitted back to hospital when further complications developed.
At the outset of the continued hearing Ms Amir applied to adjourn the hearing in accordance with Rule 58 of the Rules. Ms Amir submitted that Mr Amir has undergone a series of medical interventions over the last few months in relation to his arrhythmia. Ms Amir stated that, whilst she does not submit that Mr Amir is unable to attend, the efficacy of Mr Amir’s ongoing recovery requires him to avoid stressful situations. Ms Amir stated that Mr Amir is in a ‘dangerous cycle’, whereby stress triggers his arrhythmia, and Mr Amir’s health might be compromised were he to participate fully in the hearing and in particular continue with giving evidence at this time. Mr Amir remains under oath and is part-way through the giving of his evidence.
Ms Amir referred to the documentary information that she has placed before the Committee, which includes a letter from a consultant cardiologist whom Mr Amir saw on a private basis on 22 October 2020, an inpatient discharge summary form from Hillingdon Hospital and Ms Amir’s written summary of Mr Amir’s medical care since the hearing was adjourned on 6 March 2020. Ms Amir invited the Committee to adjourn and vacate the hearing out of fairness to Mr Amir so that he is able to participate fully in this hearing.
Ms Amir submitted that such an adjournment would allow Mr Amir to avoid a further stress-induced medical event occurring which would be detrimental to his health and would allow Mr Amir’s recovery to continue unimpeded. Ms Amir was not able to state when Mr Amir might be able to return to continue and complete his evidence were the Committee to accede to her request to adjourn the hearing.
Ms Amir confirmed that Mr Amir is not unfit to work, and that work is not stressful for him, but that instead it would be unwise for Mr Amir to participate in this hearing given the effect that its stressful nature may have on his health. [At the time I was making exceptions and only seeing a handful of patients who could not survive without my treatment. I was not able to work fully but merely helping patients in dire need.]
The Committee has had regard to the public interest in the expeditious disposal of the case, the potential inconvenience caused to any party or any witness to be called, and fairness to Mr Amir.
After careful consideration the Committee has determined to reject the application to adjourn this hearing in accordance with Rule 58 of the Rules.
My heart had continued to fibrillate and after getting acutely worse I had to have an ablation procedure at the Harefield heart hospital during a six hour procedure. My heart had been fibrillating at 150 bpm but after the procedure within a week it started fibrillating at 270 beats a minute causing acute breathing difficulties and fatigue.
After another 2 months I was taken back into hospital and had a node ablation in another four hour procedure and a new CRT device fitted. My heart continued to fibrillate at 270 bpm and my breathing rate was from 30 to 45 a minute. I was still acutely unwell.
It was not a question of me pretending to be sick to avoid the hearing but the Committee pressed on demanding that I attend in spite of my heart fibrilllating at 270 bpm and my breathing rate double of what it should norally be. The callous nature of their wrongful pursuit with no real evidence against me beggars belief.
Mr Stevens drew the Committee’s attention to Rule 26 (1) (c) of the General Dental Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules (‘the Rules’) which allows a Practice Committee to refer an allegation to the Interim Orders Committee. [Meaning to take immediate action against me] Mr Stevens invited the Committee to address his submission in its determination on the facts.
Previously I have answered the charges. However the saga started all over again when the actual trial began.
Background to the case and summary of allegations
The allegations that you face relate to the standard of care and treatment that you provided to a patient, who is referred to for the purposes of these proceedings as Patient A.
There are two specialists who l extensively criticise on my website.
1) One is Maxillofacial surgeons who extract patients’ wisdom teeth, often willy-nilly, and the patients start developing jaw problems and often severe back and hip pain and walking difficulties.. They then deny that the extraction of wisdom teeth has anything to do with that. Many patients start developing multipole health problems (including Multiple Sclerosis) and again the Maxillofacial surgeons deny that the loss of wisdom teeth has anything to do with it.
The patients jaw problems like bruxism far too often are assigned to "psychosomatic factors" or "para functions" and their bodily pains and serious organic symptoms to "medical problems". Often no treatment is offered and where it is offered it consists of:
• You should eat soft food;
• You should reduce stress in your life;
• Do jaw exercises;
• Undertake physiotherapy;
• Take pain killers;
• Take muscle relaxants;
• Take antipsychotics.
And worst of all:
• a bite guard with its inherent serious side effects with patient symptoms ALWAYS worsening as time goes on is prescribed.
All these do not work whatsoever and the bite raising appliances, actually make the patients’ condition much worse as they depress the patients’ teeth deeper in the bone and the jaw joint ends up with even less room to function.
My treatments are the exact opposite, and actually provide healing which the maxillofacial surgeons utterly fail in providing.
The GDC appointed such an expert who needs to save his own neck because I have constantly blown the whistle on their practices which cause serious harm to patients.
2) The second specialists that I criticise are neurologists who constantly sucker in patients into autoimmune diseases like the supposed Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and sell them extremely expensive drugs with the minimum price tag of £20k and up to £60k per patient per annum. Much more on this one when I answer the allegation about MS later.
The GDC appointed these two experts to pervert the course of justice instead of appointing an impartial scientist to judge my case knowing full well that the outcome will be twisted in their favour.
Justice would have been if the GDC appointed an independent and impartial scientist to evaluate my treatments. Someone who would speak to the patients, someone who would read all the literature and testimonials printed in thousands of places on the Internet, someone who would visit my office to see how I manage to correctly diagnose and treat patients saving their lives from life-long sickness and an early death and then provide an impartial report. I woulld salute any conclusion that such a person would reach.
I cannot accept the gross perversion of justice by the GDC/PCC and all their cronies who have caused hundreds of my patients intense harm.
Continue reading "Answering the GDC/PCC case against me publically - Part 5"
Saturday, July 10. 2021
I am a dental surgeon, trained at the University of London and based in London. The welfare of my patients, many of whom have been in my care for general dentistry for decades is paramount. Through the years of utter dedication, I discovered that many secrets of our health are very finely related to the symmetry of our structure. This has helped relieve patients of a majority of their symptoms usually attributed to 'medical' illnesses.
I have gathered a huge amount of qualitative evidence that proves without a doubt that dental practice needs to evolve and shift away from practices that do grave harm to patient health. My techniques and approach have helped countless patients often saving their lives. However, the GDC's Professional Conduct Committee, under very dubious and questionable procedures found me guilty for claiming success in very many illnesses and suspended me from practice.
They employed experts who had conflicting interests with my care of patients and it is incumbent upon me to go public and expose the excesses of both medicine and dentistry which are giving patients life-long illnesses, incapacity, and early death.
"Patient protection" is the pretense under which they crucify dentists who are capable of bringing about great healing to those who are currently chronically sick.
On reading my blogs you will see that "Patient protection" is the last thing on their minds. They have actually seriously harmed at least 200 of my current patients and thousands of past and future patients.
I have to defend numerous issues raised. One was the subject of this SCA article where the GDC spent at least a million pounds challenging my viewpoint. They were not interested in any successes attained and tried to prove my "guilt" through the evidence provided by an expert who had absolutely no knowledge of this subject and made up a story as he went along. You will be shocked to read the farcical nonsense of the GDC jurisprudence.
The GDC prosecution appointed “expert” reports:
Medical literature says:
"Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a form of hereditary, progressive ataxia with more than 20 identified types sharing similar symptoms. There is currently no treatment or cure to slow the progression of spinocerebellar ataxia." The neurologists also have difficulty precisely diagnosing this condition in up to 40% of the cases.
Neurologists monopolise the treatment of such patients for a condition where they neither know the cause nor have any treatment for them.
The neurologists have no answers but the GDC "expert" maxillofacial surgeon knows that this patients' systemic condition is "either partially or wholly causing these patients TMD".
There is no record anywhere in the medical literature that makes such a ridiculous assertion. It is al,ost laughable that an eminent surgeon should postuloate that a systemic condition causes TMD.
However, the clueless hearing committee appeared mesmerised by this expert's "knowledge". They did not inquire, listen or read about any patients who had recovered from their ataxic disabilities. nor did the partial expert bring such testimony to their attention. They did not ask me about my assertions either. All were hell bent on pervertting the course of justice.
In my very long experience treating hundreds of patient's very many systemic symptoms successfully, I have never found any "systemic condition" which causes TMD nor has anyone else in the world claimed such a ridiculous association. It is always the other way round. These "experts" teach in our universities and the GDC pays them millions as expert witnesses.
TMD is initiated for a number of reasons and NEVER by "systemic conditions". Briefly, these are:
• Developmentally retrognathic jaws due to dietary deprecation in modern societies. Please read Dr Weston Prices' contributions.
• A genetically smaller lower jaw. An extremely rare occurrence.
• A poor swallowing pattern causing crowding in the jaws often resulting in an inability of the lower jaw to grow forward.
• Missing teeth. That is upper lateral incisors, upper second premolars, missing wisdom teeth. These teeth are most often missing amongst northern Europeans resulting in a more upright face. Previously the eugenicists called this "a more evolved face as opposed to a prognathic African face" but we now know that these mutations managed to carry through, as they do not affect procreation.
These missing teeth are however, extremely detrimental for a proper head posture as the head's weight-bearing changes on the neck causing neck pain initially and as one ages the problems spiral down the spine. affecting multiple organ systems, skeletal, muscular and neuroloogical systems.
• Constrictive orthodontics carried out at an early age without the extraction of any teeth often cause severe ill health even as early as age 17.
• Iatrogenic orthodontic extractions of teeth to drive the upper jaw posteriorly to meet a recessive lower jaw causes serious health issues again ata very young age.
• The extraction of wisdom teeth which also drives both jaws backwards seriously endanger health.. Please see the photos in this article.
All these give rise to retrognathic upper and especially lower jaws and on full development, the condylar heads bend and beak forwards often causing the disk to slip forward giving rise to jaw clicking, difficulty opening the mouth, and pain. This is what we call TMD. This is treated by the maxillofacial surgeon "experts" by ususally first denying the patient has a jaw problem or by some palliative measures or through surgical interventions such as:
• Arthrocentesis - washing the joint.
• Reseating the displaced disc.
• Reshaping the condylar head surgically.
These are futile exercises as the jaw joint has mesenchymal tissue which regenerates back to its genetic potential and goes back into pathology. I have numerous patients who underwent such surgery at great expense with some paying tens of thousands of pounds for the procedure and they got no improvement in their condition whatsoever.
Their palliative forms of care like advising patients to:
• Eat soft foods;
• Use some ioce packs;
• Obtain physiotherapy;
• Obtain psychotherapy;
• Take drugs;
• Wear a dental splint are equally dastardly and have never helped any patient especially the hundreds I have seen over the years.
This, the expert kept from the hearing committee but went onto hark about his non-invasive treatments (like surgery) and complained about my deental appliance which =he did not have a clue how it works and he generally made a fool out of it. This very appliance had enabled the patient to walk well for the first time in 30 years andmassively reduced hus exteme jaw paina and shouder pain. The "expert" said that there is no connection between jaw pain and shouodere pain. This is patently false. Almost every patient coming with shoulder pain recovers through TMJ imterventions.
My system is the exact opposite. It addresses the actual cause after careful evaluation and aims to bring about the necessary change to immedeiately allow the patient to experience relief. It is non-invasive and extremely successful.
Only an impartial scientist can look at both methodologies and give an impartial expert judgment based on the outcomes of each method, not some biased appointee trying to save his own neck.
Appointing someone with a conflicting interest is the perversion of justice of the fhighest order.
This the GDC prosecutors vociferously and vindictively organised and need a high court jusdge to look into for the essential protection of millions of patients all around the country.
The imbalance produced by the altered jaw size and position alters the balance of the head on the neck spine. This causes the spine to compensate by rotating the 1st vertebra called the Atlas which rotates forwards. The rest of the neck spine also rotates in the same direction while the lower back compensates by rotating in the opposite direction causing hip rotation which eventually leads to an asymmetry of the hip often resulting in walking disabilities. A lot is explained in other articles so I have kept it brief here. This has never been discovered by any medical practitioner and definitely not by either a maxillofacial surgeon or a neurologist.
At the first occurrence of hip pain, dental intervention is required - not medical interference. Here, under the auspices of the medieval GDC outlook, can one imagine a dentist checking a patient's hip level? A minute change in the mouth can cause a 5 cm hip descrepancy as experienced by hundreds of my patients. When one of them reads this explnation they immediately agree as they have seen it first hand time and again.
This is the most fundamental examination which every dentist must undertake. A ONE mm discrepancy in the mouth can cause a FIVE Centimeter asymmetry in the hip. Orthodontists routinely alter the mouth by 5mm and wisdom teeth extraction can cause at least a 10mm recession of both jaws with horrific consequences upon the patient's health.
The damage to the hip is mainly from dental and jaw asymmetry issues. It cannot be corrected in any other way.
Neurologists, after failing to find a viable solution through medication, they usually explain away their failures by possibly suggesting that the patient has:
• A virus;
• A genetic condition;
• A hereditary condition;
• A mental issue in need of psychiatric drugs;
• An autoimmune disease.
I am sure many of my readers have had this exact same explanation as this practice is widespread across many systemic illnesses which my experience attributes to a dental cause.
The possible mechanism of Ataxia is enshrined in the article I wrote: "Ataxia - Is asymmetry of the Cranio-cervical junction a major cause?"
Further deficits that patients with SCA experience are caused by the occiput becoming unlevel which physically alters the shape of the cerebellum leading to neurological problems.
The rotation of the first cervical vertebrae often affecting or rather diminishing the blood supply to the cerebellum on the forwardly rotated side.
So the patient ends up suffering from:
• A compromised blood flow on one side of the cerebellum;
• Consequently neural deficits in cerebellar function causing problems with fine motor control;
• Interference in the vagal nerve innervation because of the rotated Atlas vertebra;
• Changes in the nerves emanating from the cerebellar area chiefly the hypoglossal nerve causing swallowing and speech problems.
• Visual disturbances as explained in my article on Visual Snow
Further problems that arise in such patients include:
• Stiffness in the Trapezius and Sterno mastoid muscles, which can cause severe neck pain.
• Asymmetry of the neck spine and the muscle tension causes shoulder pain often very serious, as this patient was experiencing.
• A depreciation in the breathing capacity of the patient.
• Gastric problems due to loss of full breathing capacity and vagal nerve interferences. This patient had severe gastric issues too;
• Heart palpitations because of chest breathing which is rife amongst such patients.
The explanations provided here not only cover ALL the symptoms that this patient was suffering from but also all other symptoms that arise in such patients.
These linkages were demonstrably shown to the patient when he attended for a preliminary consultation three months earlier. He was however not accepted for treatment but advised to seek free hospital treatment through the maxillofacial surgeons in three different hospitals.
All of them poopooed any associations in the bodily symptoms but instead had the audacity to tell him that there was nothing wrong with his jaw and he should do palliative treatment which he had undertaken, albeit unsuccessfully, for the previous thirty years. Every practitioner who saw him for jaw pain during the previous 30 years was negligent and at the bottom of the pile were the specialist maxillofacial surgeons who have absolutely no knowledge of orthodontics. The GDC did not pursue any of them.
Correct dental intervention thirty years earlier would mitigate or eliminate the cause. Now if it failed to eliminate the problem it would have more than likely arrested the condition from deteriorating. In fact, after one week both the son and the father were elated about how much improvement had taken place and how much his walking ability improved. Hereditary or genetic conditions show no change.
Given sufficient time, one would be able to tell if this patients' condition was of a genetic disposition. No change would occur in the presence of an inherited or genetic disorder. This patient actually experienced a remarkable improvement in just one week of wearing an emergency appliance. His treatment lasted just one week, before the GDC and its army of lawyers pounced on the instigation of his ex-wife. They also repeatedly claimed that he was my patient for four months!
I was denied the chance by the illiteracy of the GDC outfit and its gangs of lawyers who cannot see beyond their nose; much worse still the patient was denied the opportunity which has left him crippled. He has a cause of action against the GDC and his e-wife who disrupted his treatment through hearsay evidence. The GDC went along with the hearsay evidence. This woulld have been totally thrown out of a court proceeding no matter how relevant. The racist nature of this hearing did not go unnoticed by very many of my patients whose treatment has been cruelly disrupted.
A slight mediation at the outset would have been sufficient. The complainant was not the patient who was extremely happy with the improvements attained with just one week of treatment.
Treating the hip is never going to fix the TMD but treating the jaw will fix the hip 90% of the time especially if the intervention takes place early! This patient had been fobbed off by dentists and hospital maxillofacial surgeons for thirty years. He has a cause of action against every one of them. Not one of them had even a semblance of proper note keeping but the GDC has conveniently overlooked and protected these practitioners but pursued me where I had relatively far better note keeping..
The complaints handling by the GDC through the expenditure of millions of pounds with law firms for the most idiotic of complaints are a hindrance to progress in this unique field of knowledge that requires furtherance, not an obstruction and obliteration to the detriment of hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide suffering from gait issues. The all protectibg GDC does not pass the test in the dispensdation of equitrtable justiceneither to the patients nor to me. I pity all the long suffering patients all over the country being conned into medical drugs when the medical outcomes are almost NIL across multiple specialities.
Perhaps there is a different agenda at play here and any amount of explanation is not going to make a difference to the well established pill popping machinery crippling and killing millions. .
-------This website is for the essential protection of patients. Please spread this article widely through social media. You may copy and paste anywhere.-------
"Service to others is the rent you pay for your room here on earth" - Muhammed Ali.
Please bring these articles to the attention of all the patients who are chronically ill all over the world suffering from a wide variety of symptoms as per many articles on this website so they can go to the right person to get relief. Please also bring these articles to your dentists' attention so that the dentists can realise their true potential and bring about true healing in this world.
-----------The website can be converted into any language at the click of a button above ---------
Monday, June 28. 2021
“Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible” - Albert Einstein
It was interesting to come across a patient who had been diagnosed with Polymyalgia Rheumatica.
This is a self completed list of the symptoms that the patient presented with:
Whenever a patient completes a proper list of their symptoms no matter what illness labels they have been given it never actually coincides with the published list of symptoms for that particular illness. Patients who may have been diagnosed with this illness should compare their symptoms with this list and see if they are in agreement.
After 30 years of experience, I can see that the symptoms listed above are typically related to TMJ dysfunction. The extraction of wisdom teeth as per the above list is a crucial contributory factor in worsening the symptoms in patients.
I had never treated any patient with this condition before so I decided to inquire further. Here is what I came across. (Where I feel the symptoms are jaw-related, I have highlighted those symptoms in blue):
According to Wikipedia, Polymyalgia Rheumatica encompasses a wide range of symptoms classically:
• Pain and stiffness (moderate to severe) in the neck, shoulders, upper arms, thighs, and hips, which inhibits activity, especially in the morning/after sleeping. Pain can also occur in the groin area and in the buttocks. The pain can be limited to one of these areas as well. It is a disease of the "girdles" meaning shoulder girdle or pelvic girdle. [Here please note that we come across hip asymmetry and pain universally in most patients.]
• An overall feeling of illness or flu-like symptoms.
• Low-grade (mild) fever or abnormal temperature is sometimes present.
• In most people, it is characterized by constant fatigue, weakness, and sometimes exhaustion.
• Headache.
• Tenderness and sensitivity on the scalp
• Jaw claudication (pain in the jaw when chewing)
• Tongue claudication (pain in the tongue when chewing)
• Reduced visual acuity (blurred vision
• Acute visual loss (sudden blindness)
• Diplopia (double vision)
• Acute tinnitus (ringing in the ears)
All these symptoms also occur in patients who have any asymmetries around the jaws head and the skeleton as per numerous articles on my blogs.
About 15% of people who are diagnosed with Polymyalgia rheumatica also have temporal arteritis, and about 50% of people with temporal arteritis have polymyalgia rheumatica.
Symptoms of temporal arteritis are also caused by a retruded bite, inflaming the temporalis muscle every time one swallows! This was the exact experience of one of my patients suffering from Palatal Myoclonus. He experiences a flaring of his temporalis regions on palpating the region where temporal arteritis emanates by retruding his lower jaw and biting the teeth together.
Causes:
Medically, The cause of Polymyalgia Rheumatica is not well understood.
Reading carefully through the explanation below it sounds neither scientific nor evidence-based but a highly speculative statement geared to steer patients towards a highly lucrative drug-based treatment modality:
"Pain and stiffness result from the activity of inflammatory cells and proteins that are normally a part of the body's disease-fighting immune system, and the inflammatory activity seems to be concentrated in tissues surrounding the affected joints. During this disorder, the white blood cells in the body attack the lining of the joints, causing inflammation. [Getting ready to draw in more patients into the "auto-immune disease which generates a massive income in terms of supplying immune function killer drugs costing £20k plus per patient per year"] Inherited factors also play a role in the probability that an individual will develop PMR. Several theories have included viral stimulation of the immune system in genetically susceptible individuals. [This is another typical ruse - blame a virus or genetics!]
Tests available:One blood test usually performed is the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) which measures how fast the patient's red blood cells settle in a test tube. The faster the blood cells settle, the higher the ESR value, which means inflammation is present. Many conditions can cause an elevated ESR, so this test alone is not proof that a person has polymyalgia rheumatica.
Another test that checks the level of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the blood may also be conducted. CRP is produced by the liver in response to an injury or infection, and people with polymyalgia rheumatica usually have high levels. However, like the ESR, this test is also not very specific.
[Both these tests do not test for pain and stiffness which are the main features of this illness.]
Treatment:
"Prednisone is the drug of choice for PMR, and treatment duration is frequently greater than one year. If the patient does not experience dramatic improvement after three days of 10–20 mg oral prednisone per day, the diagnosis is reconsidered. [ Steroid use can cause serious complications - one of which is damage to the femoral head which would make the pelvic girdle pain much worse and possibly lead to serious incapacity and a need for hip replacement.] Also, Treatment with Corticosteroids can have widespread undesirable effects such as osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, glaucoma and cataracts. These occur because steroids can affect the gut (and nutrient absorption) and cause weight gain. The high blood pressure and eye conditions may be related to fluid retention"
"Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen are ineffective in the initial treatment of PMR, but are used in conjunction with the steroid maintenance dose." Patients are also prescribed PPI drugs with their serious adverse effects.
Regarding my patient, the evaluation of his symptoms indicated a primary jaw problem. I embarked on treating the obvious first - the treatment to correct the jaw asymmetries. The patient rapidly recovered. Here is what he wrote after recovery:
"I booked a consultation with Dr. Amir, initially for dental purposes, which led to a discussion regarding very challenging physical symptoms I was experiencing. I had received a diagnosis of Polymyalgia and Fibromyalgia, both discovered/confirmed via numerous scans under consultation with a Cardiologist and Respiratory Consultant. I was experiencing muscle weakness and pain and was unable to do basic functions such as lift a moderate weight above chest height. Following several scans and consultations, I was prescribed a high dosage of steroids and advised I may need to remain on steroids on a long-term basis. I did not take the steroid medication, but instead discussed an alternative plan with Dr. Amir, which involved wearing a dental appliance, for the purpose of achieving cranial symmetry. Considering the remarkable improvement I had seen in my children, I chose to work with Dr. Amir. After 3 months of wearing and adjusting the mouth brace, my symptoms were dramatically reduced and within 6 months, I had completely regained my strength and I was pain-free.
I went for another series of scans, the results of which showed a reversal of the opacification of the lung deposits, providing physical evidence that I was indeed getting better (despite not having taken any medicinal intervention). I am now completely well and healthy, much of which I attribute to Dr. Amir’s remarkable treatment!
Throughout all of our family’s treatment, Dr. Amir has been both gracious and professional. He is a humble, yet brilliant man, doing great work. We are sincerely grateful to him and would highly recommend his practice to everyone we know.
I think Dr. Amir should be praised for the remarkable work he is doing and sincerely hope his work is indeed given the recognition and praise it deserves, and that more aspiring dental professionals would follow in his footsteps. Indeed, I have suggested to my children that they may want to consider being trained by and working with Dr. Amir."
He was also a witness at the PCC where he pointed out that physical signs of lung damage had completely disappeared as was demonstrable on radiographs and to the bafflement of his rheumatologists, but his testimony was completely ignored. In fact, the cheek of one of the panelists was to try and attribute his recovery to probably lesser stress at his work as a senior banker. The patient corrected him by telling him that the stresses at his work were exactly the same throughout.
Unfortunately, the GDC does not believe in these incredible accomplishments. The verdict of the PCC was:
"...that all your patients speak very highly of you and your treatments and their positive outcomes, but that the results they ‘think’ they may have received is possibly the reason why you believe in your practices and that you may have been misled by your patients", while their eminent "expert" dismissed my patients' success stories to a placebo effect!
I shall introduce a graph of one of my recovered patients. An objective analysis of this graph completely dismisses their speculations about having been "mislead" or a consequence of a "placebo effect" in their conclusions about my success stories: 
How sad for all the recovered and recovering patients. It is an insult to the intelligence of my very eminent patients. It only confirms the invalidity of the GDC's judicial process faced by many dentists.
It is time that all dentists got together and demand a reduction of some 50% for their subscriptions/registration fees which are not used to elevate dentistry but to destroy it by employing whole armies of lawyers to crucify dentists and other registrants for puny errors.
They give little credence to the valuable work that dentists could provide. The health of millions of patients is entirely dependent on the care provided by dentists and NOT medical doctors.
-------This website is for the essential protection of patients. Please spread this article widely-------
"Service to others is the rent you pay for your room here on earth" - Muhammed Ali.
Please bring these articles to the attention of all the patients who are chronically ill all over the world suffering from a wide variety of symptoms as per many articles on this website so they can go to the right person to get relief. Please also bring these articles to your dentists' attention so that the dentists can realise their true potential and bring about true healing in this world.
-----------The website can be converted into any language at the click of a button above ---------
Thursday, June 10. 2021
The GDC appointed "expert" giving written evidence against my website writes:
"Background:
Pain and dysfunction related to the jaw joints (TMD) was first postulated as a condition by Costen in 1934 who described a list of symptoms forming the syndrome that bears his name; he was the first person to link jaw joint pain with the dental occlusion. Costen described a complex list of symptoms which are no longer accepted as part of TMD (including tinnitus and headache) but are related to other diagnoses."
The statement above essentially means that these symptoms and many more described by Costen have been removed from the realm of dentistry and handed over to the medical profession through some amazing wizardry so that profitable lifelong drugs, useless scans, blood tests, and consultations can be prescribed to patients throughout their lives.
Many dentists around the world have experienced that the correct treatment given to the jaws heals the symptoms of headaches etc. Dr. Al fonder described this relationship in 1976 and I was lucky enough to sit in his lecture at Manchester University some 30 years ago. His textbooks on the subject are still available. I have attended many more seminars, lectures where this relationship has been discussed and is current knowledge.
"No longer accepted as part of TMD" as the expert purports, has condemned patients to an untreatable nightmare for the rest of their lives while the GDC through its cronies condemns my successful handling of these patients - patients who, unashamedly, they purport to protect!
Wikipedia has the following to say about migraines:
"The underlying mechanisms for migraines are not fully known. They are, however, believed to involve the nerves and blood vessels of the brain. [Please remember this ploy. They always never really understand but are "experts" at treating these conditions that they little understand.]
The initial recommended treatment is with simple pain medications and paracetamol (acetaminophen) for the headache, medication for nausea, and the avoidance of triggers. Specific medications such as triptans or ergotamines may be used in those for whom simple pain medications are not effective. Caffeine may be added to the above. A number of medications are useful to prevent attacks including metoprolol valproate, and topiramate."
Globally, approximately 15% of people are affected by migraines. That is almost 1 billion people! The average drug cost is £20.00 per month, which amounts to an annual income of £240 billion! Drug costs are usually estimated to be only 10% of the cost of looking after such patients.
In spite of all these medications, no patient has EVER been cured or experienced any real relief from symptoms. So much for debunking Costen's association of TMJD to the rest of the body!
Excluding TMJD as a cause of headaches and ear problems is an utter fallacy. It condemns millions to crippling headaches and migraines. It leaves them destitute, suicidal, suffering unbelievable adverse effects from drugs, and destroys their lives by the millions. This I found was of little concern to the GDC hearing committee.
It is morally reprehensible and almost criminal for the GDC to support the stance of this "expert" and the verdict of the hearing committee to withhold such dental treatment from patients as it would be legally indefensible and an abrogation of their duty to conduct a proper inquiry into my claims rather than throwing me to the vultures.
Comparing a success rate of some 90% against zero should stir one to inquire further not throw my achievements and the chances of recovery for millions of patients under the bus.
Whose interest is the GDC serving?
It is definitely not the patients' welfare.
The GDC expert further adds this strange explanation that I have never come across before in any literature:
"Treatment of TMD (temporomandibular dysfunction) In summary, it can be helpful to think of TMD as like a camel carrying a load of straw (symptoms and aetiological causes) – removing some straw (not necessarily the straw placed last) will result in relief of symptoms and return to physiological health but adding more straw causes dysfunction."
This is the most idiotic explanation I have ever come across. Jaw dysfunction has absolutely nothing to do with load-bearing. What appears as "load" is actually caused by asymmetries of the jaw and once fixed it can function very well. Blaming the "load" for the cause of TMJD is the exact opposite of what is actually Causing TMJD.
Please explain this very odd explanation to the hundreds of patients who have been through my door suffering from TMJD where nothing had worked to give them relief nor were these patients overloading their jaw joints. They have all tried the useless palliative measures stemming from "back to front" "upside-down" understanding of the problem that you are so enthralled with victimising patients. Perhaps many maxillofacial surgeons had tried to "lighten the straw" but their measures failed miserably every single time.
The patients are looking for and need real solutions, not gibberish which my patients and I are now burdened with through the edicts of your hearing committee and your illogicality.
These are some of the hundreds of examples of the third-rate care given to these patients by your colleagues which have made these patients' lives unliveable.
1. "I have suffered, for over forty years, with severe bruxism. I have had various dentists, NHS and private, all of whom have prescribed the use of a range of different night splints. None helped.
2. I went to a private Harley St Dr where for the first time I experienced being treated like a human! Below is my OPG. He thinks it looks like my jaw is very much dislocated and he had never seen anything like it. I have been telling GPs dentists, maxillofacial surgeons for years that I am having difficulty speaking, eating & it feels as if my face is moving to the left. Nobody listened until now.
3. I am writing to you because I found your website through a community of people with TMJ dysfunctions. I have been having a lot of the symptoms listed on your website, and things are getting worse every year. The doctors keep telling me it’s my anxiety and they do not even bother to try to find the real causes.
4. I have been visiting NHS maxillofacial surgeons for 2.5 years and none of them could help me or give me the correct treatment even after they confirmed it was TMJ dysfunction. The first thing they did was to give me a hard splint to wear. After one year in pain and no positive results from the splint, they washed my jaw joints surgically! That did not work either.
Moreover, they got me to remove my wisdom teeth. I did that but that did not help at all. My pain got worse and out of control and in the end, they gave me many different kinds of painkillers and antidepressants and said if that won't help they do not have any more treatment for me.
5. The first place we tried was our local dentist. He made me a ‘splint’ to wear in my mouth to stop my teeth from touching. This, he said, would help. It did not. It made things ten times worse which I didn’t even think was possible. It caused the other side of my jaw to start popping out also. My pain and suffering continued for years and years on end. We went to see every single specialist under the sun. I saw doctors, consultants, physiotherapists, osteopaths, cranial osteopaths, dentists, maxillo-facial surgeons, orthodontists. I had many different types of other treatments to try and help including acupuncture, reflexology, reiki, etc. NOTHING helped. My pain continued to get worse, my life was total misery.
6. "Of all the specialists I saw, it was one Harley Street consultant’s comments that will always stick with me. He charged me £350 to tell me that I was anxious and therefore clenching my teeth and I simply needed to stop doing that and it would all go away. He told me to repeatedly say the letter ‘N’ to stop myself clenching my teeth. Whilst saying this letter does stop clenching, this was not my problem and obviously did absolutely nothing to help. I felt like I might as well die. Nothing and nobody could help me. If that’s all the best specialists had to say about it, then there was no point in carrying on."
7. "I first met Dr. Amir when a friend sent me Bella Freud's newspaper article about how he had helped her cure her migraines. I had been suffering severely from headaches for two years and felt deeply depressed about my future as the NHS had been spectacularly unsuccessful in finding any cause or relief for these headaches which were incredibly debilitating.
........ Dr. Amir was so confident he could help I decided to try it. it took a while, longer than he first predicted, but after four or five months he had more or less cured me."
Therefore, my request to the esteemed professor, whose advice the GDC and the hearing committee so respects and helps formulate policy to govern dentists, is how his "straw reducing method" is going to help them understand TMJD. They are confused enough. They have all been taught by such "experts" at their universities. I remember this incomprehensible jargon when I was a student. It has never changed.
I can see nothing but the GDC's arrogance and ignorance along with its "experts" rubbing this most unBritish establishment's and Britain's nose in the dirt all over the world and bringing the dental profession into dastardly disrepute.
Britain deserves better.
I fail to understand how this is ever going to help the plight of all those stuck in the medical or maxillofacial "straw on the back" quagmire.
I personally feel that if dentistry was ever to make progress and save Britons from chronic, unnecessary lifelong illnesses the GDC needs to be disbanded. Dentistry needs to be deregulated and definitely not run in its present form as it neither serves the interests of patients nor those of the dentists.
Here is one testimony from my patient who presented with Jaw Joint dysfunction and was successfully treated with dental appliances for headaches, dizziness, and tinnitus contradicting the "GDC expert" and confirming that Costen's assertions were correct.
There are 12 more successful cases in this link as well as many more on Google reviews: Migraines,-headaches-and-tinnitus-Jaw-asymmetry-or-a-medical-problem-you-decide.html
"Thank you for your time and care with my jaw problems. Your unique orthodontic approaches have given me my life back. My problems began when all four of my wisdom teeth were mistakenly removed in St. Thomas’s Hospital, London.
My health deteriorated rapidly starting with a frozen shoulder (The same as the person in question had been complaining about for 30 years and was fobbed off by maxillofacial surgeons) and progressing to extreme dizziness, head-over-the-hammer headaches, tinnitus, numbness in limbs, and tiredness. At first, I didn’t put the two things together and I thought maybe I had a brain tumour, the symptoms seemed to match. After a brain scan, I was told everything was fine. I remember feeling really upset that I still didn’t know what was wrong with me.
A dentist told me that I might have TMJD I was referred to the Eastman Dental Hospital and had a splint made for my lower teeth. I wore the appliance at night and at first, it did help my headaches. My dizziness was still very bad so I researched TMJD and then embarked on a very costly (in terms of health, time, and money) treatment plan with private dentists.
They all did the same thing - they made me splints of varying descriptions I was so determined to get better that I went along with their advice and treatments. They were ‘top’ Harley street dentists but I continued to deteriorate.
I also spent a fortune on Osteopathy and became reliant on it. These treatments covered 10 or so years. Then one night I woke up to find the room spinning. I could barely move, sit or lie down. This continued for months.
............ The orthodontic work done by you has been amazing. My dizziness is now totally under control. My teeth and jaws work and I feel so much better.
Towards the end of treatment, I also became pregnant and gave birth to a beautiful healthy boy. Without your care, this would not have been possible.
Thank you, Mr Amir and the team............M. G" -------This website is for the essential protection of patients. Please spread this article widely-------
"Service to others is the rent you pay for your room here on earth" - Muhammed Ali.
Please bring these articles to the attention of all the patients who are chronically ill all over the world suffering from a wide variety of symptoms as per many articles on this website so they can go to the right person to get relief. Please also bring these articles to your dentists' attention so that the dentists can realise their true potential and bring about true healing in this world.
-----------The website can be converted into any language at the click of a button above ---------
Monday, June 7. 2021
Dear [GDC]
There are two different positions from which I would like to submit this letter,- as a physician myself specialising in treating patients with chronic and complex illnesses and from my role as a parent with a son, age 10 who has seen Mr. Amir on a regular basis. Over the years some of my patients I have referred to Dr. Amir when his expertise and input were required (one example is within this report).
In my current professional position, I am in General Practice in East Sussex and I also work as an Associate Specialist in Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine under a UCLH contract, the University College London Hospitals.
When I recently contacted Dr. Amir’s surgery to refer some patients with mainly dental but also associated neurological problems I was informed of the limited service he can currently offer due to a time-consuming investigation I am told he is going through.
Not only is this bad news for several of my patients who would urgently require his help, but it also could cause unwanted risks for my son’s orthodontic treatment program and whose development has so far shown encouraging improvement changes under Mr. Amir’s approach.
My son was born 3 months prematurely and spent two months in a Special Baby Care Unit. From the beginning he was very floppy with minimal muscle tone and balancing problems even trying to sit straight was difficult. His brain MRI showed periventricular leucomalacia which confirmed his diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP).
As he got older he had no strength to stand on his legs and had swallowing, speech, eye coordination problems, and learning difficulties. His upbringing suddenly became a massive task and in his very early years, we would describe it as the most traumatic time of our lives.
As a physician myself specialised in integrative patient care my additional focus was on my son’s progress and to search for methods and techniques to restore facial and postural symmetry by use of exercise that could help to recover lost functions of the brain and spine.
With my professional background experience, the timely stimulation of oral and swallowing reflexes and correct use of the tongue for speech and dental development had to be one of the key priorities in his early upbringing.
I have traveled abroad for further advice on my son’s progress and I have booked appointments with various specialists. Amongst them also Harley street Paediatric dentists. Some of these encounters were expensive and relatively useless.
Only when we managed for Mr. Amir to see him and advise on my son’s structural problems and neurological weaknesses did I feel that there was not only a diagnosis of the obvious but also a treatment concept that began to evolve.
During the first visit, Dr. Amir identified a very narrow upper jaw and arched palate - abnormal use of his tongue during speech and when swallowing, and an abnormal breathing pattern. Structural bite abnormalities and associated neck and occipital problems in consequence of an atlanto-occipital asymmetry were also identified. All this was recorded, analysed, and put into a treatment plan aimed at a step-by-step plan to reclaim lost function and to address the contributing obstacles in his developmental delays.
I was impressed by Mr. Amir’s thorough assessment and his treatment approach as it looked at the totality of dysfunctions and anomalies. It was a several months process to come up with the correct orthodontic appliance (dental brace ) that Tristan would tolerate and was happy to wear. With almost immediate effect there was more strength and coordination in the use of both postural and phasic muscles. Within days we noticed that my son started to also improve on other levels.
Compared with other CP-children that we met, luckily my son’s cognitive ability and intelligence were only minimally compromised and with age increase and progress under-way with his motor development we could suddenly feel lost ground could be regained. Most importantly his own tolerance towards exercise routines has improved together with his growing confidence and his social interests and interactions. Also, there was suddenly more understanding and more cooperation in wearing dental braces despite the discomfort and inconvenience associated with their use.
Cerebral palsy is defined by its mixture of neurological conditions including ‘Ataxia’ which affect movement and can manifest in different degrees of severity. Damage especially in a premature birth situation affects specific parts of the brain and can compromise both voluntary or involuntary movements. Atactic gait patterns and spasticity were frequently mentioned in various of my son’s specialist’s assessments at Evelina and St Thomas’.
In my understanding Ataxia itself is a term used for a group of disorders that affect coordination, postural balance, speech, most voluntary movements such as gripping, and the selective engagement of muscle groups but also automated movements eg. the ability to swallow, to walk, etc. At some stage, my son was simultaneously affected by all of these dysfunctions to various degrees.
As long as he was wearing Dr Amir’s dental appliances his symptoms and his spasticity were less pronounced, his sleep better, and his fine motor skills more fluent and faster evolving.
May I remind you that Ataxia is commonly understood to have no cure as there are no medications that can specifically improve and cure the symptoms of ataxia.
By integrating non-pharmacological models such as the knowledge of the inter-relationship between structural and neurological physiology, the entire management of ataxia symptoms could become more of a dynamic approach with flexible assessment and treatment strategies. My son is the living proof, that this works in real life, - he is now 10, attends mainstream school, -his motor strength and balancing are constantly improving. He can now independently walk with two sticks and to some degree, his walk is now more coordinated and his pathological leg scissoring reflexes are less active when the appliance is worn in his mouth. I am beginning to suspect that an integrated care strategy for managing ataxia as Dr. Amir can offer could provide some hope for many suffering individuals [with ataxia].
The following case demonstration may serve as an example for the type of patient who could benefit under the acceptance that medical and dental pathologies overlap and that optimised management for a certain type of patient category can only result from an MDT approach or active cooperation between the two professions.
Such a shared-care patient is Mrs. Claire W an entrepreneurial and dynamic businesswoman in her forties who came to see me, initially for the treatment of her unexplained Myasthenia reactions which show in a sudden loss of muscle tone and sudden collapse onto the floor in public places.
From the knowledge that these reactions were linked to exposure to drugs, environmental toxins, chemicals, even perfume odours she had no other option than to avoid all public spaces, transport systems, supermarkets. For years she battled with this detrimental condition known as Multiple Chemical Hyper-Sensitivity MChS). The isolation and bleakness in her life brought her close to suicide and she allegedly made contact with Dignitas in Switzerland at this stage.
My own assessment and treatment approach gave her hope and stabilised her situation, the details of which would prove to be too much for the purpose of this letter. When at a certain point she plateaued and it became obvious that other structural factors such as dental, TMJ, and cranial imbalances would need to be addressed to make further progress I decided to contact Dr. Amir in 2009 when I first came across his work.
Mr Amir accepted her as a patient for an initial assessment but admitted that he had never treated anyone in such a fragile state and that it may take time for a care plan to evolve in a safe and manageable way. He realised she had a hidden but serious jaw and orthodontic problem and suggested a course of treatment.
When the first fitting of the prescribed appliance took place the patient apparently collapsed when reacting to the substances of the device despite precautions of using hypoallergenic materials. Alternative materials to which she didn’t react were eventually found under some difficulties. The subsequent recovery process was steady and continuous however not a linear process and on several occasions, my own medical interventions were required to steady her situation.
The uniqueness of the case which began from an almost hopeless starting position attracted the attention of a national newspaper. In an article written by editor Bella Freud, a society journalist the patient explained that the unique path she chose saved her life and that other patients with complex illnesses, allergies, or MChS could perhaps be helped in a similar way by accepting and understanding the influence that dentistry has on patients’ immune systems.
Meanwhile, I continued monitoring this patient and she has not relapsed since and has enjoyed a very full life for many years in the meantime.
When I recently visited Mr. Amir’s homepage, I identified a common theme running through his website which is the protection of the public. I am an avid reader and as a result, I have adjusted my own views and understandings on some of the conditions that are mentioned for example under cardiology, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, neck injuries, etc.
I consider myself qualified to comment as I specialise in ‘Integrated medicine’ which brings together conventional medicine with safe and effective complementary medicine and work in a UCLH department which provides musculoskeletal rehabilitation and also receives regular referrals from Dental hospitals for patients with jaw and temporomandibular joint disorders and the impact these poorly understood conditions have on the neurological stability of those patients.
Mr. Amir’s recent article on the jaw and hip connection is an eye-opener and should be read and discussed by as many dentists, medical doctors, physios, and osteopaths as possible.
From my own interest in oral and dental health and by analysing the history of many patients that I have seen I have come to understand more of the interference and reflex effects between teeth, maxillary conditions, and inner organs and also of the influence from facial and trigeminal nerve signals which via sensory-motor cortex activation can trigger downstream spinal and autonomic response activation and I, therefore, concur with Mr Amir in almost everything he says.
I am stunned to find out that a professional with such integrity and pioneering interest can be threatened by prosecution for allegedly making false claims that he could help patients with diverse health conditions when for many within this group thanks to his interventions the outcomes demonstrate a turnaround and acceleration in their recovery. Many patients have even uploaded personal accounts of their unexplained recovery or even feeling fully cured.
From what I have also observed and increasingly question as a father with a son who gradually pulls out of his CP-associated developmental delays assisted by orthodontic intervention is whether in many chronic illnesses the often associated dental issues should not be factored in more to achieve better treatment outcome or to slow down accelerating disability and decline from influences seen in spasticity disorders, ataxia, postural tachycardia syndrome, etc.
I entirely trust that with the high level of professionalism and expertise of which the GDC is known of, that their investigators will conclude that Mr. Amir is a highly qualified and motivated dentist and that he is popular from the results that he is achieving.
It’s obvious that not every patient can be helped, be pleased, or be cured, but the peer feedback for him and the positive testimonials from patients who are all over the internet demonstrate high quality and success rates of his practice. I even think that his knowledge needs to be imparted to the rest of the dental community to stimulate professional dialog and research.
In my view, he is a thoroughly honest person and not interested in accumulating wealth and I have witnessed that the surplus that his clinic makes he seems to directly re-invest in the quality improvement of his practice and further staff training.
I hope and trust that the GDC can see right through some of the potentially biased allegations against him and that a balanced view can be taken. There is a wide range of desperate patients who are requesting appointments from him and in need of his surgery’s services, - my 10-year-old son is just one of them.
Please feel free to pass this letter to all who may be concerned about this matter.
Yours truly,
Dr S. T.
PS
Guess what was the response of the GDC?
They suppressed this very eminent German doctors' letter and did not bring it to the attention of the hearing committee. This I call a perversion of justice of the highest order and a governing body hell-bent on harming patients rather than trying to enlighten the dental profession about new horizons which could halve our NHS expenditure.
Perhaps it is apt to read this article for the patients to understand why we belong to such a perverted system of medical governance which is founded on treachery and deceit. Medical care has become the nemesis of society where merciless illness creation to amass profits is more important than finding a cure.
Who are these governing bodies serving? Definitely not patients as my experience clearly shows. Here is another source of immense concern for those who are chronically sick:
Wall Street Admits Curing Diseases Is Bad for Business
"Yes, a Goldman analyst has said outright that curing people will hurt their cash flow. And he said that in a note designed to steer clients away from investing in cures. Can “human progress” have a bottom? Because if so, this is the bottom of so-called human progress—down where the mud eels mate with the cephalopods. (Or at least that’s how I picture the bottom.)"
Please read the full article here.
-------This website is for the essential protection of patients. Please spread this article widely-------
"Service to others is the rent you pay for your room here on earth" - Muhammed Ali.
Please bring these articles to the attention of all the patients who are chronically ill all over the world suffering from a wide variety of symptoms as per many articles on this website so they can go to the right person to get relief. Please also bring these articles to your dentists' attention so that the dentists can realise their true potential and bring about true healing in this world. -----------The website can be converted into any language at the click of a button above ---------
|
Comments